It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why do they need large quantities of ammonia nitrate and booster materials then? Are they going to counter attack with truck bombs?
The Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibited the use in international warfare of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the body.[3] This is often incorrectly believed to be prohibited in the Geneva Conventions, but it significantly predates those conventions, and is in fact a continuance of the St. Petersburg Declaration of 1868, which banned exploding projectiles of less than 400 grams, as well as weapons designed to aggravate injured soldiers or make their death inevitable. NATO members do not use small arms ammunition that is prohibited by the Hague Convention.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
Why do they need large quantities of ammonia nitrate and booster materials then? Are they going to counter attack with truck bombs?
Those materials are most useful when employed as cratering charges. For area access denial on roads, before bridges and runways, etc.
Am I missing something? Where did you hear that?
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
Why do they need large quantities of ammonia nitrate and booster materials then? Are they going to counter attack with truck bombs?
Those materials are most useful when employed as cratering charges. For area access denial on roads, before bridges and runways, etc.
Am I missing something? Where did you hear that?
I heard it from a Liberty Alert by Bob Livingston (15 Aug 2012).
About 90% of the IEDs in Afghanistan utilize an AN based main charge.
That doesn't make any sense.
If they wanted to put large craters in the roads they would just drop bombs. And destroying the roads denies them the roads also. It makes no tactical sense. It would be way more practical to just set up fortified road blocks at key choke points.
Craters are effective obstacles to enemy movement when constructed properly and located at critical points along his movement route. Craters are normally placed on roads or other high speed movement routes the enemy is expected to use. They should be placed at locations that cannot be easily bypassed such as cuts or fills.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
DHS and ICE buying a lot of ammo is not a big deal. Do the math. Each training session requires 300-500 rounds. Therefore, to train a large force, one needs lots of ammo. And that is not mentioning that it is downright stupid to think that these dept.'s wouldnt have a HUGE stockpile of ammo, just in case. You think they wait for S to HTF and say "oh crap, we're out of bullets"? No.
The SS administration one is the only one I see that is an eyebrow raiser.