posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 09:26 PM
The point is not that they are introducing something majorly invasive, its the fact that people are willingly going to go along with this. For an
example of how they use "desensitization" to slowly lure people into tyrannical systems, look at the "Big Brother" t.v. show. It pits
"attractive celebs" against each-other, in a building filled with cameras. Now people think its "cool", and "hip", to be watched every second
of your life. Its like the boiling frog, if you slowly turn up the temperature, it wont know its being boiled until its to late.
They do this all the time, an especially good example is when things get "leaked", one could imagine that its often leaked on purpose, in order to
"test the waters", and see how people react. Its also used as a "steam valve", just like the "Occupy" protests, it distracts people from the
real issues, and gives them something to keep them temporarily happy. This introduction to Facebook is just "testing the waters", seeing how far
people will allow them to invade our privacy, step, by, step. The whole "use it at your favorite stores", "get discounts", advertising gimmick,
is exactly what they did with the RFID, slowly, but surely, introducing us to a world where human values are rooted in spying on each-other. Take a
good read of Orwell's 1984, its literally the blueprint to what our world will soon become, and Facebook is beginning to introduce
Here is a quote that gives one a perspective on just what this "testing the waters" phase is going to introduce.
It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could
give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself – anything that carried with it the suggestion of
abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced,
for example) was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called. (1.5.65)
This is what we need to be worried about, not what they are introducing today, or even tomorrow, but what this slow process will lead to 10 years from
now, or even 20. Our rights, freedoms, liberty's, have been slowly eroding away, as we sit complacent in our consumer cultures, of dreams, but no
actions. The lower class has risen dramatically in number, and the wage gap has risen with it. Next thing we know we are going to have every inch of
our lives watched, monitored, probed, and the scary part is that at this rate, we will be okay with it...