It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by insaan
Originally posted by Jake321
reply to post by insaan
Warning shot into the ground now? You obviously have no clue about guns at all. Besides the point that you ignore that he was probably already on the ground or at ground level. A shot into the ground depending on the angle has a good chance to ricochet. You are responsible for a bullet from the time it leaves your gun until it comes to rest. Besides you ignore that according to the source he was close to unconsciousness firing a warning shot might have been just as good as handing his gun to his assailant. A good rule to carrying a concealed gun is to never pull it unless you’re going to use it.
I'm sure I know more about guns than you do, and don't use the "probably" word when you are talking about a child's father being killed in front of her.
You're assuming that the father had the intention to kill the cop, keep making assumptions, an angry man can easily come back to his senses with a warning shot, I have seen it many times before.
Originally posted by Honor93
he is not a first responder, not an EMT and certainly not a Dr ... he had NO business tending to her at all.
Originally posted by Honor93
btw, what he did by ditching the bike isn't what ANY experienced rider would do.
a controlled lay down, sure that's reasonable, but, to bail and let an out of control vehicle damage whatever or whomever is in its path ??
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
YAY for not being able to give of a warning or a warning shot - nooooo, shot for kill. Yes, thank you.
Whatever the father was in your eyes, he was the godda*nfrickin' father of a little girl!
And the cop shot him, instead of giving of a warning shot! If that was supposed to be a warning shot which was misleaded by pure bad luck, well so be it.
If he shot to kill the attacker, it is just a sign for "DON'T WEAR GUNS, YOU MORONS!" - because another one of these things just took the father of a little girl!
what article ??
Originally posted by captainpudding
Originally posted by Honor93
btw, what he did by ditching the bike isn't what ANY experienced rider would do.
a controlled lay down, sure that's reasonable, but, to bail and let an out of control vehicle damage whatever or whomever is in its path ??
Once again, what article are you reading? The one the rest of us read says he intentionally laid down the bike in an attempt to avoid a head on collision. Your implication that he just hopped off the bike and let it continue on without a rider is completely unfounded and in direct opposition to all available evidence.
bailing from a moving vehicle (regardless the type) is not what i would expect from ANY experienced rider, let alone a cop.
Camden said the officer's decision to bail from the bike prevented a head-on collision.
He intentionally "ditched" the bike in an effort to avoid hitting her, but it was too late. His bike slammed into 4-year-old Taniyah Middleton, as well as her 18-year-old cousin, who had run out to help her.
i'd really like to read any article that says this ^^^^ got a link ??
The one the rest of us read says he intentionally laid down the bike in an attempt to avoid a head on collision.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by captainpudding
i'd really like to read any article that says this ^^^^ got a link ??
The one the rest of us read says he intentionally laid down the bike in an attempt to avoid a head on collision.
btw: the last time i was rear-ended by a Dr (driver), even he didn't offer medical assistance or so much as get his medical bag out of his car.
in other words, if anyone is required to offer medical assistance, he would have been.
The officer laid the bike down to avoid hitting her, but the motorcycle skidded and flipped, hitting Tani’a and John Passley, her 18-year-old cousin who had ran into the street to help her, according to a statement from Larry Shapiro, Maywood’s spokesman.
The accident left the girl with minor injuries and the officer with a broken ankle and dislocated shoulder, officials said.
The 43-year-old officer, an eight-year veteran of the force, intentionally ditched his motorcycle Saturday night in Maywood when he saw the little girl – identified by WLS-TV as Taniyah Middleton – suddenly run into his path.
The downed bike skidded down the street, slamming into the 4-year-old and her 18-year-old cousin John Passley, who had rushed to help her.
www.wsws.org...
The police officer, in an attempt to avoid striking the child, deliberately placed the motorcycle on its side. Nevertheless, it continued to skid, and hit the girl and Passley, causing injuries.
As he was driving home, the officer says he saw a child unexpectedly run into the street. In order not to strike the girl directly, the cop jumped off his motorcycle, pulling it down on its side on the pavement. However, the motorcycle skidded and flipped, hitting the 4-year-old girl and her 18-year-old cousin, John Passley.
yeah, i could have but the OP didn't link any of those stories.
That should suffice. You really could have just Googled the Fathers name and found all these yourself.
'
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by captainpudding
yeah, i read the whole thread and i've been present on many accident scenes.
guess what ?? it's against protocol for cops to administer medical interventions of ANY kind.
they are not authorized. [not supposed to even apply a band-aid]
105 CMR 171.000: Massachusetts First Responder Training
171.010: Purpose
105 CMR 171.000 is set forth for the purpose of interpreting and implementing M.G.L. c. 111, § 201, which confers on the Department of Public Health the responsibility for establishing training standards in first aid, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, for certain police officers, fire fighters and lifeguards, hereinafter referred to as “first responders.”
First Responder means a member of any of the following entities: a police or fire department; the state police participating in highway patrol; an emergency reserve unit of a volunteer fire department or fire protection district, and persons appointed permanent or temporary lifeguards by the Commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions. A first responder shall not mean a police officer, firefighter or persons engaged in police and fire work whose duties are primarily clerical or administrative.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by captainpudding
yeah, i read the whole thread and i've been present on many accident scenes.
guess what ?? it's against protocol for cops to administer medical interventions of ANY kind.
they are not authorized. [not supposed to even apply a band-aid]
they direct traffic, coordinate communications and secure the SCENE, not the victims.
On behalf of every law enforcement officer, firefighter, and EMT/Paramedic in the United States the American First Responder Institute extends congratulations to Police Officer Christopher Elliott of the Chicago Police Department. Officer Elliot works in the 14th District on the North West Side of Chicago.
Officer Elliot is being hailed as a hero after he revived a choking toddler around Wednesday night. Elliott had been writing a traffic crash report near the intersection of Diversey and Western in the city’s Logan Square neighborhood when a man ran up to his car, tapped on the glass and asked for the officer to come to the 15-month-old boy’s aid. The child’s parents did not speak very much English but Elliott went immediately into action to save him.
According to the Chicago Sun-Times, Elliott proceeded to administer CPR by doing chest compressions on the child and turned the boy over in order to clear out food that had been blocking his airway. The boy then began to breath on his own before an ambulance arrived on the scene and took him to the hospital, where he was checked out before being released Thursday morning.
the officer was not "mortally" challenged in any manner so what gives him the right to fire upon an unarmed man?
unless you were there, you are making an assumption of which i don't agree.
Originally posted by Sparky63
reply to post by Honor93
He intentionally laid his bike down in an attempt to avoid hitting the 4 year old.
I don't see why that is hard to understand.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Sparky63
you are entitled to your opinion and i certainly haven't attacked yours.
however, first responders are not always cops and cops are not always first responders.
that depends on the state you're in and in Chicago, see for yourself.
arc-chicago.axxiomportal.com...
what does Mass standards have to do with this incident or conversation ??
not all cops are certified first responders.
some teenagers are more qualified than the cops on the beat.
ps ... none of the stories/articles indicate that this cop was a certified FR.
you speak as though a certification lasts a lifetime or the life of employment and that's not even true.
since the responding cop has been on the force for 8 yrs, it's more likely than not that any certification he held, expired.
you insinuating that all cops are certified FRs, is ridiculous.
just so we're clear, my assumptions are no more extreme than yours.
from the details revealed in the articles, i am only asking reasonable questions.
which, btw, you haven't answered, just provided argumentative commentary.
so, carry on ... is no skin off my nose.