@Everybody ok! Uhmmm?
As far as I can see it at face value,... these are the fears that are being operated off of ...
The awesome lady ... has her fears about the kids going hungry and not being able to cover the ordanance fee's and insurance etc. If she could of
she would of ... but she can't and won't as those $ are prioritized as going towards the kids getting fed
The awesome council ... has their fears about being held legally liable if something goes wrong because they LOCAL council is made up of and paid for
by the ... oh yeah Local parents and other people. They also want to get paid so they can buy the insurance to cover her becuase they will bhe signing
of on her variance which makes the legally liable.
The awesome kids ... fear going hungry and not being taken fully care of
... and they don't fear this lady or the food she serves them and they
were all simling as they sat and ate good food that she provided for free and with on going oversight by the council and now including the mainstream
The Insurance company is waiting for the money and for everything to be legally above board before they will even consider cover the risk with an
Her fears are well founded enough that I accept them at face value and I commend her for her 100% praiseworthy actions.
The councils fears are also very well founded that I accept them at face value and OL commends them for holding her to account of the rules but OL
feels that they could waive the $1000.oo in fees for her to aquire a variance because that would be the charitable thing to since she is already
feeding their kids for free with their oversight via the local council sending welfare workers around to check on her and they are only speaking up
now because of the legal $$$ issue and a wise adherence to the rules.
The power here lies with the parents because they know where their kids are and with who and doing what!
And they already do ... They are on that local council who sends welfare workers around.
The kids fears are that their parents can't feed and take care of them properly or they would be over at a well to do friends house playing xbox etc.
instead of eating this ladies free food because I am sure they have gone without food at some point and they would know what that feels like and they
wouldn't want to see anybody go without food, especially other kids, because generally kids are good natured at heart.
The Insurance company fears for the risks its shareholders ould be taking on and if the whole thing isn't fully above board legally then there
isn't any point in selling the council insurance as they know the insurance company wouldn't allow a claim to ever be made due to the lack of
appropriate legal paperwork in full.
So ... how to quash all these fears?
For the lady ... she needs to keep doing excatly what she is doing and has been doing and will continue doing ... but she still needs to also get this
variance so that everything is in pefect legal order ok.
For the council aka the parents ... they need to waive the $1000.oo variance fee or start feeding their kids ok.
For the kids ... they need to obey their parents and they must never ever forget what this lady has done for them.
Now if it is still all about the $1000.oo variance fee that the council would then use to buy the insurance they nedd becuase they would then agree to
'cover her' if any thing , god forbid
, went wrong etc.
Could any ATS members with FB or Twiiter ... try to make this story go viral because if just 1 elite person donates $10.oo and that inspires the
other 99% too follow suit then this issue would go away ...
And the lady could get on with what she does best and keep feeding those kids and educating them to the REAL meaning of community.
And the council could sigh a big relief and sign off on her and buy that insurance to cover any tragic occurance.
And the Insurance company can go that 's way cool ... of course we will cover that with a policy since it is fully legitimate legally. May no
unfornseen tragic occurances happen becuase that is the companies shareholders annual dividend profits at stake.
And the kids can continue to get free healthy food and can rest assured that their parents are feeding them and are taking care of them .. becuase
their parents on the local council would have fully endorsed and APPROVED this ladies future actions and bought insurnce to cover this lady and her
working with the kids and therefor also cover those same kids by proxy in the event of a negative unforseen happening.
Personal Disclosure: Am I making any sense?