The out of Africa "is a theory", and its not one I support in the least, considering that is a cap on human existence and cycles.
For example, explain the 3 milliion year old screw.
7 million year old hominid skull France.
A fossil of a human handprint, for example, was found in limestone estimated to be 110 million years old. What appears to be a fossilized human
finger found in the Canadian Arctic also dates back 100 to 110 million years ago. And what appears to be the fossil of a human footprint, possibly
wearing a sandal, was found near Delta, Utah in a shale deposit estimated to be 300 million to 600 million years old.[
...Humans were not even around 65 million years ago, never mind people who could work metal. So then how does science explain semi-ovoid metallic
tubes dug out of 65-million-year-old Cretaceous chalk in France? In 1885, a block of coal was broken open to find a metal cube obviously worked by
intelligent hands. In 1912, employees at an electric plant broke apart a large chunk of coal out of which fell an iron pot! A nail was found embedded
in a sandstone block from the Mesozoic Era. And there are many, many more such anomalies.
Out of Africa coincides with Maura Biglino's statements about the annanuki labs, and at about 270 000 years ago.
Its funny how they almost put their theories into factoid and ignore other finds. Makes no sense.
We didn't all come from Africa. Not that coming from Africa is bad, but its bad science and is a control agenda to cover the truth.
So what are they hiding?
By the way, if there were other humans around, possible survivors of other catastrophes and possibly from quite advanced civilizations, Im sure they
edit on 13-8-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)