reply to post by SheopleNation
You're telling me Dr. Sal's mole could be drawn on from a sharpie? Look, we all know about movie magic and make up, so yes Dr. Sal could have a fake
mole but that doesn't mean it is a fake mole and he is really Frank Vidal. Also, Frank Vidal in the first video cleanly has hair growing back from his
freshly shaven head. As far as the sun goes, judging from all the videos neither of these men spend a lot time soaking up the rays. And finally, they
both appear to have terrible diets and definitely don't exercise, just like most of America.
This is not an open and shut case, so accept the fact that there are gonna be some people who disagree with you. It happens.
reply to post by MightyPenfriend
I like you but I'm not going to keep repeating myself to you. Seriously, just read my original post in this thread.
For everyone, this poster made an account to post in the original thread their experience working in the movie biz. Of course this person can be full
of poop, but let's read and then judge.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
This was a wall of text so I created paragraphs for easier reading.
tepee
I am suprised that with all the scrutiny many obvious things are overlooked. The additonal moles on his head? When we fake things in the Movie
business we don't go overboard purposely because of scrutiny. A fake(hollywood style) would never encompass multiple moles. The never look real ..a
rounding, a natural and uneven rise of a real mole is hard to fake...much less multiple. His face width, eye, and mouth distance
relationships(granting direct size comparitive being impossible because of differing focal lenght ..ie shot at different distances and lense
configurations) are clearly different.
I now have a neighbor who is an exact look alike for a famous actor, Not only does he resemble him but his gestures..voice..physical gate...almost
everything is identical. And I knew the actor for many years so I am very familiar with this guy. My neighbor feaks me out sometimes because I think
he is the other guy many times...in speech, mannerisms ...the like. So on the pyshical identifiers I belive it is 2 different
people...clearly....similar BUT different.
BUT I agree the accent is off...he is many times looking just below camera to a script..and for the double(Frank the Actor) to have tweeted a similar
and very unique quip about alien turds is way to close for it not to be staged.So what is the real answer? THE # is going to hit the fan in the next
couple of years NO MATTER WHAT reliable or unreliable source you plug into so ....wake up and prepare for CHANGE. stop worring about the messenger and
get the message...one way or the other.
edit on 13-8-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)
