It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Dr. S. James Gates, Jr., a theoretical physicist, the John S. Toll Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland, and the Director of The Center for String & Particle Theory, is reporting that certain string theory, super-symmetrical equations, which describe the fundamental nature of the Universe and reality, contain embedded computer codes. These codes are digital data in the form of 1′s and 0′s. Not only that, these codes are the same as what make web browsers work and are error-correction codes! Gates says, “We have no idea what these ‘things’ are doing there”." www.transcend.ws...
World famous neurosurgeon Wilder penfield held a deep disbelief that consciousness was a product of the anatomy of the human brain but that it was coming from another source. Much like a television set the programming comes from another source.
Originally posted by neoholographic
The material brain needs a user/observer just like the remote control.
It's funny how scientist just make these huge leaps when talking about the brain. The logic goes like this:
Well, this part of the brain is active when X occurs THEREFORE this part of the brain must be responsible for X.
This makes no sense and it's a huge leap that is rooted in a materialistic belief. It's like saying because the light on my remote is active when I change the channel, therefore my remote must be responsible for changing the channel. My remote needs a user/observer and so does the material brain.
The material brain is stimulated by the 5 senses. There must be a 6th sense or a field of consciousness that stimulates the material brain.
This allows us to recall specific memories at will. The material brain doesn't know the difference between a memory from little league or a memory from College. How does the material brain know which memory I wish to recall?
How does the material brain know the difference between a fastball, curve ball and a slider? How does the material brain know which pitch I want to throw?
There has to be a use/observer that stimulates and interacts with the brain. It's impossible for the material brain to accomplish these things.
It's like pushing start on the microwave. The microwave becomes active because the user/observer not because of the microwave.
I think all things operate with this field. The human brain is just advanced enough to interact with this field.
edit on 12-8-2012 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)
The material brain needs a user/observer just like the remote control.
It's funny how scientist just make these huge leaps when talking about the brain. The logic goes like this:
Well, this part of the brain is active when X occurs THEREFORE this part of the brain must be responsible for X.
This makes no sense and it's a huge leap that is rooted in a materialistic belief. It's like saying because the light on my remote is active when I change the channel, therefore my remote must be responsible for changing the channel. My remote needs a user/observer and so does the material brain.
The material brain is stimulated by the 5 senses. There must be a 6th sense or a field of consciousness that stimulates the material brain.
This allows us to recall specific memories at will. The material brain doesn't know the difference between a memory from little league or a memory from College. How does the material brain know which memory I wish to recall?
How does the material brain know the difference between a fastball, curve ball and a slider? How does the material brain know which pitch I want to throw?
There has to be a use/observer that stimulates and interacts with the brain. It's impossible for the material brain to accomplish these things.
It's like pushing start on the microwave. The microwave becomes active because the user/observer not because of the microwave.
I think all things operate with this field. The human brain is just advanced enough to interact with this field.
The most powerful systems in the world are ranked by the total number of “petaflops” they can achieve. A single petaflop is equal to 1 quadrillion calculations per second — or 1,000 trillion operations. By comparison, IBM researchers have estimated that a single human brain can process 36.8 petaflops of data.
IBM’s Sequoia clocked in at an astonishing 16.32 petaflops, whereas the K Computer maxes out at 10.51 petaflops. IBM said in a media advisory last year that Sequoia should top 20 petaflops by the time it is fully built-out.
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy
and again, your remote DOES change the channel. Try pushing on your palm while pointing your hand at the TV. Make the same push button motion on your palm that you would on your remote and tell me what your TV does. Now normally the remote wont operate without a user that is true but to say that the user changed the channel in only partially correct. The user did this with the remote. The user no matter how well intentioned and no matter how much they wish it will never get the TV to change channels just by pointing their hand at the tv. That would be great if it could as I seldom loose my hand but constantly loose the remote. LOL