reply to post by XaniMatriX
That is exactly what im saying, when a human is born they dont hate anyone or hurt anyone unless they see someone else do it in turn, and i witnessed
that first hand with many new born children.
That's your children, not all children. I remember being a devil as a child. Nobody taught me how to deceive, it came naturally to me. No one taught
me how to trick people for my own profit, it came naturally to me.
In fact, people had to teach me how to be good from that evil. I was born evil, then taught good. And many I grew up with never learned good.
Nature is the same way, animals do not feel hate or take revenge, somewhere at some point in time, we must have witnessed such acts, other wise i dont
see nature being the one to hate, or even provide such conditions.
That's false. Stab a whale with a spear and he'll never trust humans again in some cases. In some cases they may actively seek revenge for the deed.
Treat them with respect and you will have mutual friendship. Ever hear of the Killer Whales of Eden?
Nature has plenty of shows of revenge and hatred. Once species learn emotions, it's practically one of the largest emotions present along side
Do you ever think about killing people? if no, then what makes you think others are born thinking any different, its the influence after that creates
Actually yes, and I'd be surprised if you never have. Once again, your experience is not the be all and end all.
No such thing as "russians" really, it was just some people that came to the land and just lived there, no police, no politics, no churches or
religion to speak of, just human beings living, which hard for a lot of people to grasp the idea. When viking came to the land and discovered the
"russians" they could not fight them, so they worked hand in hand, and "Russians" are really good at taking other peoples habits and culture
practices, so no evidence would be found since there "culture" is mixed.
Where is the genetic proof?
Now back to OP's original post, we were talking about a global civilization exsisting past 10k years, which has nothing to with the natives, but all
i was saying, is that it is highly possible that a very advanced culture or civilization exsisted in the past, and that is why there are architectural
similarities, because they all shared their knowledge, if they were primitive and violent, that would not be possible, and this thread would not even
be here, since there would be no architecture to speak of.
That's also false. The Muslims did not share their knowledge with the westerners. The westerners invaded their lands in defense of being invaded, and
saw the architecture, medicine, and science, then brought it back to their own people.
I see no reason why such ancient civilizations would be any different.
edit on 14-8-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)