It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by borntowatch
I was not describing JUST biological evolution. I thought that was obvious
Biological evolution is just 1 type of evolution as I understand it
The Different Types Of Evolution I know of
The following types of Evolution are described:
1. Cosmic Evolution: The origin of time, space and matter, by the Big Bang
2. Chemical Evolution: The origin of higher elements from hydrogen.
3. Stellar and Planetary Evolution: The origin of stars and planets.
4. Organic Evolution: The origin of Life.
5. Macro-Evolution: The changing from one kind of species to another kind of species.
6. Micro-Evolution: The variation within kinds of species.
Read more:
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives
Originally posted by Prezbo369
How you understand it, is completely and utterly incorrectly...
The theory of evolution explains the diversity of life on earth. Nothing more, nothing less.
Pro-life-tip, stop watching kent hovind videos and then regurgitating it as-though you've discovered something.
Convicted felon hovind is well known in these parts, his pseudoscience wont hold any water and he's probably the least credible source of information anyone could ever cite.
You should take your own advice and go read up on this.........and not from a creationist website........
edit on 23-8-2012 by Prezbo369 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-8-2012 by Prezbo369 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheCaucasianAmerican
Originally posted by borntowatch
All those words and not a drop of hard science.
That is faith
This is what Wikipedia describes scientific theory is
A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
So based on that can you show me the
repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment facts relating to evolution
please
Didnt think so
Back to school for you dear boy
Would it be acceptable for me to call all evolutionists and or atheists retards?edit on 23-8-2012 by borntowatch because: (no reason given)
Can you also do the same?
Thought so ha.
I am not just describing B I O L O G I C A L evolution, that word biological should indicate something rather unique in the explanation.
The theory of Galactic evolution (might want to look that up)
chemical evolution (might want to look that up)
Should I go on or is it naff enough yet?
Good to talk like a grown up but shouldnt you know what you are talking about first?
Originally posted by TheCaucasianAmerican
reply to post by borntowatch
How am I pwned you produced really actually nothing.
You flipped it around to make it seem lime you were cool.
So no you have no more say than I do. And im an agnostic.
I asked for evidence from your part. All you gave was a not well thought up post.
So don't waste my time again. Yhvh is frowning upon his illegitimate son.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by windword
These threads are just a valid, interesting and important as all your threads, preaching against other's beliefs, condemning Catholicism, Islam etc
There's only one God sugarpuss, and his name isn't Dagon, Saturn, Sol Invictus or Allah.
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by TheCaucasianAmerican
Originally posted by borntowatch
All those words and not a drop of hard science.
That is faith
This is what Wikipedia describes scientific theory is
A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
So based on that can you show me the
repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment facts relating to evolution
please
Didnt think so
Back to school for you dear boy
Would it be acceptable for me to call all evolutionists and or atheists retards?edit on 23-8-2012 by borntowatch because: (no reason given)
Can you also do the same?
Thought so ha.
Wow you have me on toast, I am reeling and running, my faith is now diminished, oh wait thats right mine is a faith, I dont have evidence so I accept it on faith
Yet you on the other hand have diddle squat and call it scientific faith *oops I meant theory*. Yours is a faith as well, its a religion of belief
Simply no I cant show you evidence as you cant show me either, but I am not pretending its anything else like you
We call that pwnd where I come from, Chortle chortle.edit on 24-8-2012 by borntowatch because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by borntowatch
The theory of Galactic evolution (might want to look that up)
chemical evolution (might want to look that up)
Stellar evolution
Stellar evolution is the process by which a star undergoes a sequence of radical changes during its lifetime.
Should I go on or is it naff enough yet?
You say no and wikipedia and all the links say yes.
Originally posted by Lysergic
Funny if the faithful are so faithful whey would they care to argue with the non-faithful about how much more right they are?
So is that like self-pwnage where you come from?
Originally posted by Prezbo369
Originally posted by borntowatch
The theory of Galactic evolution (might want to look that up)
As I told you earlier, there is no such thing as 'The Theory of Galactic evolution'. The link you supplied is for Galaxy formation and evolution, the name given to the study of said phenomenon.
chemical evolution (might want to look that up)
Again, this is not a scientific theory, however what you are attempting to describe is Nucleosynthesis. Why supply links to sources you've obviously not read for yourself? It makes you look like you don't know what you're talking about...
Stellar evolution
Once more this is not a scientific theory.
From the article:
Stellar evolution is the process by which a star undergoes a sequence of radical changes during its lifetime.
Here we get to the real meat of your ignorance. Evolution is change over time, whether it be in regards to living organisms, mountain ranges, mobile phones, dance, whatever.
When you say "For Adults who refuse to grow up, Evolution is the Adult version for real magic", unless your claiming that things in general don't change over time......you're talking about biological evolution, the evolution that you and your fellow creationists actually have a problem with.
You have no idea what the words you're using actually mean, you've merely heard/read them from a creationist source and are repeating them here as-though you're an authority on the subject, enough so that your veiled attempt at mockery simply collapses under the weight of its own stupidity.
Should I go on or is it naff enough yet?
Have at it
You say no and wikipedia and all the links say yes.
As we've discovered, you have no idea what the links you supplied actually describe....
Originally posted by TheCaucasianAmerican
reply to post by borntowatch
I don't need any evidence for my beliefs. I don't criticize you for what you believe do I?
If your so certain why do you have to be self conscience and try to gain approval from other people?
Because your not gaining it from me. So nothing you can say will make me any different in this topic.
You get your beliefs I get mine. I don't need other people to tell me im right or wrong like you do.
So please take your religious business elsewhere. Because frankly I don't care dude.
Originally posted by borntowatch
So you deny they all involve evolution
Great link on the theory of stellar evolution, please have a read and enjoy
Just explain how and why these stellar clouds condense and what causes them to spin?
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
www.freerepublic.com...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by Lysergic
Funny if the faithful are so faithful whey would they care to argue with the non-faithful about how much more right they are?
So is that like self-pwnage where you come from?
Cos its fun, what the fun police here now as well?