posted on Aug, 13 2012 @ 01:36 PM
Just had a thought and had to log in for this thread...
All revolutions just start. Full out shooting, killing, etc... This makes it easy for the government to clamp down and claim National Defence or
terrorist or whatever words they use to manipulate and deceive the people.
If the pen is mightier than the sword then what if you combine the two?
The constitution is a legal document so it seems to me that a legal document to defend it should be created and upheld as well. The writing of such a
document and the notarization of it by a lawyer and then filing it against the government, sending a copy to every single government on the planet
possibly filing it with them and their legal systems along with the United Nations, assures that you have a legal right to revolt and that it is not
terrorism and that it is in fact a permissible action.
This leaves the government to deny your legal challenge for revolution in the courts and on the battlefield. They would have to prove that they are
upholding YOUR rights under the constitution and that the revolution is illegal while they are fighting you. That would be impossible for them to
The key would be coordinating the legal delivery with the actual armed revolution.
Just a thought. I'm not an American so hopefully the US Government doesn't disappear me for getting an idea from your thread.
edit on 13-8-2012 by CourageousEyesoftheHeart because: (no reason given)