reply to post by Consequence
Why do you need to be so condescending? It’s really quite annoying considering, and no doubt you would be this condescending to my face.
Also, I have read your other post and besides from still being condescending, again talking like you know more that people who have studied this there
whole life and trying to relate space-time to a CPU and super Mario bros you haven’t really said anything besides everyone is wrong but you.
Where’s you Nobel Prize in Physics? Hmm let me guess you don’t have one, I’m sure that’s not a surprise to anyone.
But maybe I was really clear in what I was trying to get across, mainly because I just had a thought, wrote it down and didn’t expect to have some
wannabe time travel expect on my case claiming that time travel is impossible because you says so, even though many serious physicists would disagree
And considering time passes every second isn’t that a form of time travel? I know I’m being pedantic. My bad
So my idea around time being circular is that ridiculous to you considering that theory’s on time have changed with each new great mind that brings
there ideas to the table,.
So first Newton thinks time is Linear, Einstein famous law of relativity, Stephen Hawking 3 pronged approach to time, Prigogine where time precedes
creation so what’s not to say a theory around circular time is not possible? Because you say it is or?? Ever Hawking, one of the greatest mind of
our time (Excuse the pun
) has thought up the chronology protection conjecture which prevents time travel to anything greater than sub atomic
particles, which would mean time travel is possible for sub atomic particle and thus time travel is possible. Granted it’s not proven, and is only a
conjecture but Hawking’s is hardly going come up with some nonsense for the sake of it.
The theory of faster than light travel could lead to time travel, granted that the energy need to propel even a 1kg object at the speed of light would
be astronomical, however with the latest discoveries on the Higgs, this would neglect all formulated equations which depend on the mass of the object.
Reverse the Higgs boson effect and you have zero mass.
Also, theory around tachyon particles which travel faster than the speed of light, which travel backwards through time. Granted that again this is a
theory but these particles are not forbidden to exist within the framework of relativity.
I could keep going on about this, and how many theories out there like wormholes, closed-curved time lines, alternative time lines, parallel worlds
the use of quantum entanglement but I honestly can’t be bothered, because I’m going for a drink. I would say you can go Google all this and have a
read, but no doubt you already know all this and it is all nonsense.
So having now explained quickly some time travel theories, I’d like to say that my little circular time theory is as valid as any other, because
it’s a theory and new theory’s and new science if discovered every day which make previous suggestions theory’s possible. Oh and the existing
out of space-time to observe – Prigogine theory where time precedes creation – if true then space-time are not link and you could travel through
time which space remains same.
So again most of the comments you made about time being well defined, time travel not being possible etc have just been discounted by the theory’s I
have just given, by people who know what they are talking about.
So I guess you will know reply with little sarcastic comments to each section or you could be really surprising and actually not be condescending.
Only time will tell (Again sorry about the pun