It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dr Sal's Warning

page: 24
132
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:38 AM
link   
reply to post by ViktorHaze
 


In that very instance, a message was sent, they replied, we got to asking questions and they thought oh hey, your planets about to go through some #. To them it was probably like saying hey I got your mail.

I could go on and on about proposed life forms, their where about's, what they think or look like, but it's all just guesses until we actually get to meet, or see one, this video is nothing until we look into this man. He could be a sad loser, if that's the case let's prove it, how ever he could be truthful and in that case holy crap! Actual contact!

It is neither at this point, the message means nothing at this point, Intelligent whatever he says it is, is anything but that until we can figure out this Sal, sol, Salvador, Salvidor, Salvadore, Salvedore, What ever the correct spelling for verbal pronunciation is. We can do nothing else but argue at this point, and we all make valid points, even the fat lonely psychotic grab from attention points.

Let's work it out.




posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by queenofangels_17
 

If you turn to the last page of the Holy Bible, it's an altogether better ending!


Thirsty anyone?



Reflect upon the prodigal son whose return caused the angels in Heaven to rejoice. We're waiting!

Edit to add: That time has come. That time, of the retun of the prodigal son, is now, this day, today!


edit on 11-8-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)


The reference I was making is about the sinner who repented to God, who is like unto a son who was dead (when he sinned) and come back to life ( when he realized his sins and repented to God.. and was forgiven by God.)

The angels in Heaven rejoice in such a man, more than they would of 99 righteous who have no need to repent.

- - I hope you are not referring to Jesus, when you said the prodigal son has returned, now, this day, today..

Because it would have been a bad analogy.. Jesus was never a prodigal son, for God has made him dutiful to his mother, Mary.

19:32 And hath made me dutiful toward her who bore me, and hath not made me arrogant, unblest.

19:33 Peace on me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!

Peace!



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Druscilla
 

What I was trying to point out earlier, but you put up some good excerpts.
I did the math on the signal, not plausible...strike 1.
Magnetic pole reversals are a non starter, they happen more regularly than not, geologically speaking.....strike 2.
As someone else said, the Van Allen belts can't ever touch the ground... I'm not sure about that, but it seems more likely it would dissipate before it ever did that.....and your OUT.
No one can verify this guy....
Maybe he's a demon?



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ilyich

Originally posted by chr0naut
I'll put my hand up here and say that I do have a pretty good grasp of pan-dimensional physics. It is highly likely that it isn't what you think it is.


I tend to think that both Dr Sal and his 'message' is bogus.

The implications of the things he is saying run contrary to what we know of physics and astronomy.

133 days seems far too short for sub-luminal communication to our distant space 'space brothers'.

Pole shifts cannot overcome the inertia of almost an entire planet's mass of iron and therefore cannot occur in the timeframe suggested.



Please elaborate? I am to understand our core produces our Magnetic field, I'm also to understand drastic changes are to occur for such a Magnetic pole # to occur. How long do you project for enough of a deviation, change with in the dynamo effect for the field to collapse. His understanding from the transmission was a pole shift/collapse of the magnetosphere. He as well as his colleagues have interpretted Shift from the data, but it could simply outline the collapse itself. Do we have means to measure the dynamo, effect with in the core? Can we tell if it is changing other than pole deviation, this has occurred in the past, over many years how ever what causes it, could these causes be increased by any means?

At the very least it's a fascinating thought experiment, would you not agree? Nothing is impossible, physics has proved this time and again through out history.


The iron in the core of the Earth is at different viscosities due to different temperatures, which are functions of pressure.

In the inner core, iron is hottest and most fluid but as you move closer to the crust the iron becomes cooler and thicker.

This causes a differential in rotational speed between the inner core and the outer core that creates a geo-dynamo effect causing the magnetic field.

Because of the liquid nature of the iron core, the magnetic poles wander and can even wander far enough to pass the tipping point where stability is overcome and the poles travel to the opposite hemisphere.

These reversals take somewhere from 1,000 to 10,000 years to happen.

The classic signals of a pole reversal being about to happen is a weakening of the major magnetic dipole and multiple small dipoles (multiple magnetic norths and souths) occurring. Please review this link on Wikipedia.

A magnetic pole reversal/loss would also likely leave the Van Allen Belt both functional and at some distance from the Earth. It would not collapse the magnetosphere.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:42 AM
link   
reply to post by r2d246
 

That's because he doesn't have a friggin' clue what he's talking about...
Besides, I thought you were convinced it was demons lying to them?
Or are they telling the truth about that part, just not that they are demons?



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ilyich
reply to post by r2d246
 


Where in the bible does it say that earth would be the only planet with life? It simply says that our world was created for us, and that god created all the universe. The focus is mainly on Earth in these texts, and if god exists would it not make sense he exists infinitely through out the universe over all life? Just because Man was made in his image does not mean other life elsewhere was not created.


Well I didn't really want to get into any details as to why, but since you seem to be asking. It's like this. To be a Christian you believe in the trinity. One of the fundimental measures of what defines Christianity. So Jesus was God. 1/3rd of the trinity. So he comes to earth. Shows us the way. Then is sacrificed to atton for all sin past, present and future. And he even revealed that he knew it was gonna be "very painful". So it wouldn't make any sense for him to do that over and over in different planets. Plus in revelations it takes about God setting up his kingdom for a time on earth for 1000 years. If there was tons of planets that time line would be messed up. Cuz he'd be bouncing around dying, then setting up a kingdom for time etc etc. Plus he never said anything about there being life on any other planet. God reveals most things. He doesn't hold back information and keep tons of secrets. He operates out of truth not deception. So why would he not reveal that there's other people, other life, and explain how he'd die here. Then die on other planets as well. etc etc. That would make zero sense. I think this world was his project.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ilyich
reply to post by ViktorHaze
 


In that very instance, a message was sent, they replied, we got to asking questions and they thought oh hey, your planets about to go through some #. To them it was probably like saying hey I got your mail.

I could go on and on about proposed life forms, their where about's, what they think or look like, but it's all just guesses until we actually get to meet, or see one, this video is nothing until we look into this man. He could be a sad loser, if that's the case let's prove it, how ever he could be truthful and in that case holy crap! Actual contact!

It is neither at this point, the message means nothing at this point, Intelligent whatever he says it is, is anything but that until we can figure out this Sal, sol, Salvador, Salvidor, Salvadore, Salvedore, What ever the correct spelling for verbal pronunciation is. We can do nothing else but argue at this point, and we all make valid points, even the fat lonely psychotic grab from attention points.

Let's work it out.

Kinda off topic, "but if Dr. Sal" really is Italian, then his name would be Salvatorre.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:49 AM
link   
reply to post by r2d246
 

Maybe your god is the one who's lying, ever consider that?
Believe in me, there is nothing else, everyone else is lying, so I kicked them out of my clubhouse...
Sounds like a spoiled brat to me.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Holy crap Batman, I never heard such absolute nonsense in my life. This guy blew his wad at the end and made his agenda very clear. He perhaps has good intentions of trying to get the human race together but he should be ashamed of himself for the vehicle he is attempting to use to do it. Disgusting doom porn at its worst.

By the way this man says he is of Italian heritage. Riddle me this? How is it that his accent THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE VIDEO is clearly SPANISH????

What a jokeR.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by chr0naut

Originally posted by Ilyich

Originally posted by chr0naut
I'll put my hand up here and say that I do have a pretty good grasp of pan-dimensional physics. It is highly likely that it isn't what you think it is.


I tend to think that both Dr Sal and his 'message' is bogus.

The implications of the things he is saying run contrary to what we know of physics and astronomy.

133 days seems far too short for sub-luminal communication to our distant space 'space brothers'.

Pole shifts cannot overcome the inertia of almost an entire planet's mass of iron and therefore cannot occur in the timeframe suggested.



Please elaborate? I am to understand our core produces our Magnetic field, I'm also to understand drastic changes are to occur for such a Magnetic pole # to occur. How long do you project for enough of a deviation, change with in the dynamo effect for the field to collapse. His understanding from the transmission was a pole shift/collapse of the magnetosphere. He as well as his colleagues have interpretted Shift from the data, but it could simply outline the collapse itself. Do we have means to measure the dynamo, effect with in the core? Can we tell if it is changing other than pole deviation, this has occurred in the past, over many years how ever what causes it, could these causes be increased by any means?

At the very least it's a fascinating thought experiment, would you not agree? Nothing is impossible, physics has proved this time and again through out history.


The iron in the core of the Earth is at different viscosities due to different temperatures, which are functions of pressure.

In the inner core, iron is hottest and most fluid but as you move closer to the crust the iron becomes cooler and thicker.

This causes a differential in rotational speed between the inner core and the outer core that creates a geo-dynamo effect causing the magnetic field.

Because of the liquid nature of the iron core, the magnetic poles wander and can even wander far enough to pass the tipping point where stability is overcome and the poles travel to the opposite hemisphere.

These reversals take somewhere from 1,000 to 10,000 years to happen.

The classic signals of a pole reversal being about to happen is a weakening of the major magnetic dipole and multiple small dipoles (multiple magnetic norths and souths) occurring. Please review this link on Wikipedia.

A magnetic pole reversal/loss would also likely leave the Van Allen Belt both functional and at some distance from the Earth. It would not collapse the magnetosphere.



We have found magnetic anomalies all over the earth, bermuda triangle, zone of silence, there are tons of them, could these not qualify as multiple dipoles? I am to understand from what I have read, of both kinetic, geomagnetic, and convection based dynamos pretty specific conditions are required for the effect to one, exist and two, maintain balance. I'll give it Earth has had plenty of time to settle in, but we are well overdue and do we know the exact results of a pole reversal? Not entirely, no one has been around long enough or recorded it. Don't take me for a doomsayer I'm after logical discussion given no one seems to care about looking up old sal anymore. The Mayan calendar is circles with in circles, could this not in itself represent the layers of earth. Say they some how were scientifically aware changes had happened in the past and could happen in the future.

What has to change in any of the above dynamo effects for the change to occur, a loss or change in inertia. I understand how the dynamo is produced, I understand it requires sustainable momentum how could earth's layers convection be changed in such a way to produce a pole #. IF it's happened before let's find clues for the process and elaborate. If we can prove with out a doubt it's impossible okay, but stranger things seem to happen.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by r2d246
 

That's because he doesn't have a friggin' clue what he's talking about...
Besides, I thought you were convinced it was demons lying to them?
Or are they telling the truth about that part, just not that they are demons?


I see 3 plausible explainations:

1) hoax, can't rule that out

2) a hacker, or someone playing a joke that for some reason they couldn't figure out

3) If he's telling the truth. And they ruled out a hacker, then it was a demon replying. They do talk to people all the time, all over and if you don't know who you're talking to then they will deceive you. They're definitely not gonna reveal that they're a demon tha'ts for sure.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:51 AM
link   
Hate to do this but this is a bunch of crap. I looked up the Arecibo schedule for the date of reply and it was closed for maintenance .web.archive.org...://www.naic.edu/vscience/schedule/scedfra2.htm



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Antonio1
 


# thank you !!!!!



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by r2d246

3) If he's telling the truth. And they ruled out a hacker, then it was a demon replying. They do talk to people all the time, all over and if you don't know who you're talking to then they will deceive you. They're definitely not gonna reveal that they're a demon tha'ts for sure.


No, it's not for sure.
Demon my hairy muscular butt.
Next time you say demon, I want pics or it didn't happen.
I don't care how many times you said scary latin phrases over a black candle while high out of your mind.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:57 AM
link   
I found some papers written by a conti, S along with other researchers on the Harvard site under the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) section of their educational abacus.

Here is the link bellow:

Nasa Papers written by Conti, S between 1994 and 2011

There are papers from a S,conti on the page pre 1994 however I noticed those papers are related to universities in Geneva, Switzerland. The papers from 1994 to 2011 all have relationships with Italian universities. The dates match up with the google+ account and his recollection of events which is interesting.

Also, the name sergio is used which is likely a different alias.. maybe a pen name. Instead of arguing over the information lets just dig deeper. Only digging for dirt is helpful at this stage as I personally don't know what to think and im sure many other people are in the same boat.

Co-operation and not separation people.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 12:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by r2d246
 

Maybe your god is the one who's lying, ever consider that?
Believe in me, there is nothing else, everyone else is lying, so I kicked them out of my clubhouse...
Sounds like a spoiled brat to me.



Believe whatever you want it's up to you.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 01:01 AM
link   
reply to post by hirenumradia
 

Problem with that is he could easily have picked that name out of some papers on the subject and crafted this lame story around it, hoping no one would dig to deep. He obviously takes people as foolish enough to just buy this stuff without looking into it, otherwise he would have tightened up the details, for as they say "the devil is in the details"....oh, crap r2d2 is gonna have a field day with that..."DEMONSES!!!"



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 01:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by ViktorHaze

Originally posted by r2d246

3) If he's telling the truth. And they ruled out a hacker, then it was a demon replying. They do talk to people all the time, all over and if you don't know who you're talking to then they will deceive you. They're definitely not gonna reveal that they're a demon tha'ts for sure.


No, it's not for sure.
Demon my hairy muscular butt.
Next time you say demon, I want pics or it didn't happen.
I don't care how many times you said scary latin phrases over a black candle while high out of your mind.


Why are you so offended by the word "demon"? Is it just demon? or is it bible, church, God, Jesus, Angels as well?
edit on 12-8-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 01:03 AM
link   
I didn`t read all 24 pgs. but I did watch the video .. one thing puzzled me .. we don`t know the ET`s time frame 331 days between responses and we don`t know what that time frame means to them but they can pinpoint our pole reversal to the year and month ? Just saying



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 01:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by r2d246

Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by r2d246
 

That's because he doesn't have a friggin' clue what he's talking about...
Besides, I thought you were convinced it was demons lying to them?
Or are they telling the truth about that part, just not that they are demons?


I see 3 plausible explainations:

1) hoax, can't rule that out

2) a hacker, or someone playing a joke that for some reason they couldn't figure out

3) If he's telling the truth. And they ruled out a hacker, then it was a demon replying. They do talk to people all the time, all over and if you don't know who you're talking to then they will deceive you. They're definitely not gonna reveal that they're a demon tha'ts for sure.


I've sent you a demon. enjoy holy boy



new topics

top topics



 
132
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join