It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jeantherapy
reply to post by Ameilia
Why don't you go to Mexico and have it done? I reckon it would be a lot cheaper anyhow.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by paleorchid13
Wow...talk about a gullible, insensitive argument... Many of these girls are not even given the choice if they are wards of the state... they are just told, "here sign this", and they are sterilized without their consent, and you are fine with it?...
No wonder the world is in so much trouble wiht insensitive, and EVIL people thinking like this...
Originally posted by Ameilia
I wanted my tubes tied when I was 18 years old. I was willing to pay for this, as an it's optional procedure. I would have even been happy to finance it and pay interest. Doctors refused because I was "so young I will change my mind."
I wanted my tubes tied when I was 25. See above.
I'm now 31. That's 13 years of wanting to be fixed I'm still "too young" as of 6 months ago.
So exactly when do *I* get to decide what I want to do with *my body* you ask?
Apparently sometime when I'm past reproductive age. You know, when it no longer matters...
Let em get sterilized if they want to. It's their choice, their body. At least this way they will have access to the medical procedures they should have access to.
This is the only part of Obamacare I've heard of that I actually agree with.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
In Oregon, the age of informed consent is 15, and the law and rules on sterilization are detailed in the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 436.205 to 436.335.
Hahaha what I find funny about this is these girls can't consent to sexual intercourse but they can consent to sexual sterilization. Ahhh the hypocrisy in this world.
Wth? Since when? Is there a law in US that dictates how old you can start having sex at???
Originally posted by HamrHeed
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Obamacare is part of a greater de-population agenda. What else will it take to convince people? I am just amazed at the volume of people who are accepting this. Do people have some kind of misguided idea that it's not doing what it is doing, or that it's some kind of crazy collateral for the supposed benefits touted by the Democrat Party?
STERILIZATION IS GOOD FOR HUMANS.
Originally posted by paleorchid13
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Depopulation agenda ? Giving people who don't want or can't handle more kids, super easy access to the means of obtaining that? Sounds like "sound" economics to me.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Sovaka
No it is about sterilization dude. But really I don't see anything really wrong with it. It's their choice, it's not like they are being forced to do anything... if the law says they can consent to such a procedure at 15 then that's their decision.
As far as I read it, it is Birth CONTROL, NOT actual Sterilization. Two completely different things.edit on 11/8/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by paleorchid13
reply to post by xuenchen
Let's not misconstrue this . The age of 15 is a legal age of consent as far as reproductive choices ..fine. There is no pro-life/pro-choice argument against sterilization so now they have to make an issue out of it, targeting the semantics of law.
How's that for divide and conquer?
Originally posted by liquiddrewl
reply to post by xuenchen
Hopefully the women who will in the future be Obama types will take their option of sterilization and save the future! Obama is really saving the world a lot of hassle with this, sure women can get around because of this but fortunately their genes stop NOW. Train crash.