Lost Egyptian Pyramid Found, page 1

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 47 times

Topic started on 10-8-2012 @ 11:44 AM by Mianeye

This is going to be kind of interesting, could be nothing or another "Bosnian Pyramide anomalies", but will follow this very close, i am actually excited.

Google earth coordinates.
Site one: 28°21'26.12"N 30°25'41.74"Ø

Site two: 29°32'38.10"N 30°38'50.19"Ø

Read more here

Some more here

Two possible pyramid complexes might have been found in Egypt, according to a Google Earth satellite imagery survey.

Located about 90 miles apart, the sites contain unusual grouping of mounds with intriguing features and orientations, said satellite archaeology researcher Angela Micol of Maiden, N.C. One site in Upper Egypt, just 12 miles from the city of Abu Sidhum along the Nile, features four mounds each with a larger, triangular-shaped plateau. The two larger mounds at this site are approximately 250 feet in width, with two smaller mounds approximately 100 feet in width.

According to Micol, both sites have been verified as undiscovered by Egyptologist and pyramid expert Nabil Selim, whose findings include the pyramid called Sinki at Abydos and the Dry Moat surrounding the Step pyramid complex at Saqqara.

edit on 8/10/2012 by tothetenthpower because: --Mod Edit--All Caps Title.

edit on 10-8-2012 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 11:54 AM by Teye22

reply to post by Mianeye

nice find indeed. God only nows how many more are scaterred without us niticing them. will also be keeping an eye out for this. I certainly hope they are the real thing....imagine what we could find in there...

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 12:06 PM by Blackmarketeer

Satellite imagery is proving most useful for uncovering sites like these. There could easily be hundreds of "lost" pyramids in the Egyptian countryside.

A while back Hanslune had a good post about another "lost" pyramid (not so much lost, just really unknown to most); Khufu's little known satellite pyramid, G1-d. It just shows you how even a well-mapped site (like Giza) can still reveal some surprises.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 12:07 PM by rhynouk

Originally posted by Teye22
reply to post by Mianeye

nice find indeed. God only nows how many more are scaterred without us niticing them. will also be keeping an eye out for this. I certainly hope they are the real thing....imagine what we could find in there...

I agree,there must be loads more out there buried somewhere,we just have to find them.I love anything ancient egypt so i'm always over the moon when a new discovery comes to light.

keeping an eye on this i am

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 12:13 PM by g0dhims3lf

Can someone post the coordinates so that we may look it up? Im trying to browse around the locations mentioned in the article but having no luck.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 12:15 PM by PrinceDreamer

Really nice find Mianeye, it is just frustrating that we will have to wait probably years to know much more about them

I believe that the pyramids (at Giza) are much older than current doctrine dictates, maybe as much 8000 years older, from a time when Egypt was temperate and sub tropical rather than desert, and if I am right then there could be hundreds if not thousands of ancient monuments buried under the sand.

At least the more they find, the more we can look at their alignments and perhaps get a better understanding of their purpose and who really built the first ones.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 12:20 PM by Mianeye

reply to post by g0dhims3lf

Working on it, spend 15 min. on Google earth but wery difficult to spot.

Found one

28°21'26.12"N 30°25'41.74"Ø

Found two

29°32'38.10"N 30°38'50.19"Ø

edit on 10-8-2012 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:02 PM by howmuch4another

Originally posted by Mianeye
reply to post by g0dhims3lf

Working on it, spend 15 min. on Google earth but wery difficult to spot.

Found one

28°21'26.12"N 30°25'41.74"Ø
edit on 10-8-2012 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

Thank you OP this was the one I was pulling my hair out looking for. Very interesting. Noted what I would call a tomb entrance on the smaller feature. I am intrigued by the paths leading to the "triangular plateau" and its circular mounds on top. It seems that there may be a cave or opening near the summit of one of those paths.

I am looking for higher res photos on the webz and have been finding dead ends.

edit on 8/10/2012 by howmuch4another because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:08 PM by babybunnies

Well, the great pyramid and the other two with it are in the position of Orion's belt, if we take the Milky Way as being representative of The Nile.

If these two new pyramids have been found, are they corresponding to other star positions in the heavens based on this map from the same time period?

This would be my first question.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:11 PM by Xcathdra

Nice find..

If you take the pictures you posted and change their color to red and greysih / blackish white you have pictures that look like the anomolies on Mars and the Moon.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:12 PM by nixie_nox

I have heard Egyptians say that 50% of lost Egypt hasn't been discovered yet and still remains to be found. So it is perfectly plausible.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:20 PM by Harte

Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
I believe that the pyramids (at Giza) are much older than current doctrine dictates, maybe as much 8000 years older, from a time when Egypt was temperate and sub tropical rather than desert, and if I am right then there could be hundreds if not thousands of ancient monuments buried under the sand.

Then you'll need to have an explanation for the C14 dates arrived at from carbon-containing samples of mortar taken from the Great Pyramid (and other sites at Giza) which puts it at about 2600 BC or so.

You'll also need to explain the indisputably Egyptian glyphs found in sealed areas of the Great Pyramid (and other pyramids) as well as the glyphs found by the robot exploring in the shafts that end in the Queen's Chamber. These are far enough up into the shaft that nobody could have painted them on except if it was done during construction.

Egyptian glyphs = Egyptian Civilization. There's no evidence for any earlier civilization there, and we do have evidence indicating that hieroglyphics were invented by the Egyptians, and not learned from some earlier culture.

Harte

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:22 PM by howmuch4another

reply to post by Xcathdra

whoa...no doubt very similar man. I'm going to do that with the Giza plateau and put as my screen saver.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:25 PM by g0dhims3lf

reply to post by Mianeye

Thanks! very much appreciated

edit on 10-8-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: added reply to.

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:47 PM by g0dhims3lf

What do suppose all those circles off to the upper right of the anomalies are? If you look close some look like polar clocks same amount of sections and everything.

edit on 10-8-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: added image

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 01:58 PM by Mianeye

reply to post by g0dhims3lf

Propably irregation fields

Hmm..Can't get the pic to work, but i see you got the point below

edit on 10-8-2012 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 02:01 PM by g0dhims3lf

reply to post by Mianeye

Haha not probably, definitely

... thanks just letting my mind wander. Learned something new though, Im a dummy when it comes to agricultural matters.

edit on 10-8-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 02:30 PM by PrinceDreamer

reply to post by Harte

Then you'll need to have an explanation for the C14 dates arrived at from carbon-containing samples of mortar taken from the Great Pyramid (and other sites at Giza) which puts it at about 2600 BC or so.

I don't have an explanation no, mostly because as far as I am aware they have not carbon dated any mortar at all, mainly because motor is ground up rock and cannot be carbon dated, now they have carbon dated burnt charcoal from the local area which they PRESUME was used to make the mortar, however they did this by examining other sites they presume were built at the same time as the pyramids, see here

Archaeology.org

You'll also need to explain the indisputably Egyptian glyphs found in sealed areas of the Great Pyramid (and other pyramids) as well as the glyphs found by the robot exploring in the shafts that end in the Queen's Chamber. These are far enough up into the shaft that nobody could have painted them on except if it was done during construction.

There is only one hidden area in the great pyramid where hieroglyphics were discovered, in somewhat dubious circumstances. There were NO hieroglyphs found in the shafts, there were marking but they were not Egyptian Hieroglyphs. As for other pyramids, I do believe they were copies the Egyptians made because of teh great pyramid inspired them

Egyptian glyphs = Egyptian Civilization. There's no evidence for any earlier civilization there, and we do have evidence indicating that hieroglyphics were invented by the Egyptians, and not learned from some earlier culture.

Hieroglyphs argument is invalid to me, and I would say the great pyramid its self is proof of an earlier civilisation. But hey if you want to base your dating of the great pyramid on early Napoleonic archaeologists who were using the bible as a dating method, that's fine by me

reply posted on 10-8-2012 @ 04:42 PM by ladyteeny

i watched a documentary on structures that satellite imagery had found over egypt... the bbc article about it is here :

www.bbc.co.uk...

but i'll see if i can track down the docu because it's well worth watching

edited to add: found the docu, not the best copy but all the info's there