The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Why is is necessary to form an opinion at all until at least the other side has a chance to respond? Why is it we naturally assume the worst about law enforcement, and yet are expected to withhold judgement about other accused parties who aren't LEOs?
This has been going on for a year. Apparently there wasn't enough to file criminal charges against the officers, so now we're taking the civil case route, which is more than fine and her right to file. If she wins, she'll get paid big-time. And the burden of proof in a civil matter is much lower. The attorneys are no doubt on contingency, so she won't pay them anything unless she wins. All they need is a jury who are ready to do exactly what you're doing - assume the cops are evil. They don't even need to be sure. Just lean that way. Better than lottery odds, no doubt.
And who'll pay? Not the cops. She'll get her big settlement (maybe, if she wins) and the city will have to lay off some poor schlub, or schlubs, like you or me to make up the difference.
And wouldn't that be awful if it turns out it's all just a big lie and attempted money grab? We certainly don't know that it isn't. All we know is, a suit's been filed by someone who's no stranger to the criminal court system, and it's got some highly inflammatory accusations in it. That's it.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
edit on 8/10/2012 by yeahright because: (no reason given)


