It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by miniatus
What cannot be proved or disproved is never obvious or evident.. to be evident requires evidence.. and there simply isn't any =)
Originally posted by miniatus
That is affecting the feedback.. Just with any interface you provide input and you get output.. if football was once pleasurable then the feedback would be pleasurable.. if the software malfunctions and suddenly football does not provide a pleasurable feedback, then the controller wouldn't like it either..
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
You could do a million tests to find a soul and come up empty handed every single time. Bodies have been cut in half and no beings of light have come out. People die and nothing has appeared out of the corpse. No soul has ever been observed, photographed or manifested in all of human history. If that is not enough evidence, the scientific method should be worthless to you.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
I guess my point is nothing you said is evidence against the reality of the soul, because it is not generally accepted as being something you can see, touch, or feel in the material world.
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
Maybe try my metaphorical attempt to explain it, while semi-pissed?
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by miniatus
That is affecting the feedback.. Just with any interface you provide input and you get output.. if football was once pleasurable then the feedback would be pleasurable.. if the software malfunctions and suddenly football does not provide a pleasurable feedback, then the controller wouldn't like it either..
I see, kinda. This is more akin to two way communication between brain and soul, then. What happens when you take away the brain, does Dave like football or not, now, or is it that he is no longer bothered by such mundane questions pertaining to this world?
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
You could do a million tests to find a soul and come up empty handed every single time. Bodies have been cut in half and no beings of light have come out. People die and nothing has appeared out of the corpse. No soul has ever been observed, photographed or manifested in all of human history. If that is not enough evidence, the scientific method should be worthless to you.
You could do a million tests to find dreams and come up empty handed every single time. Bodies have been cut in half and no dreams have come out. People die and nothing has appeared out of the corpse. No dreams have ever been observed, photographed or manifested in all of human history. If that is not enough evidence, the scientific method should be worthless to you.
Yet we dream, do we not? Dreams may not be real in the sense that a cup is real, but they are certainly real in the sense that we clearly experience them, we "do" dream - that gives dreams more of a reality than nothingness.
Dreams are not a material "thing", so we cannot see them using the scientific method, we can only see the effects of dreams, like reactions in the brain, or flickering eye movements. To a person who does not dream, there is no evidence that dreams exist besides testimony of others. The soul, to believers, is like this, so one would not expect to see evidence of their existence as one would a material thing, so science cannot say anything on the subject except "we cannot see any evidence such a thing is real, and we wouldn't expect to".
EDIT: Oops, I meant to add this to my previous post but I overwrote it instead, so my initial reply is lost.edit on 10-8-2012 by humphreysjim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Yeah? Then what is it?
Observable gravity: Cavendish Experiment
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Yeah? Then what is it?
Observable gravity: Cavendish Experiment
You are observing the effects of gravity, not gravity itself. Gravity is not a thing that can be seen like a cup can be observed.
What is a soul? I don't believe in souls myself, I cannot say what a soul is, only what it supposedly is not - a material thing.edit on 10-8-2012 by humphreysjim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
Wait, you've changed your post a few times. Do you dream? I do. I have experienced dreams. Have you experienced a soul? Not me. I have never experienced a soul. Have you?
Dreams are an event, not a thing or substance. Can you bottle running? Can you measure laughter? No, but you can experience them.
Can you experience or measure soul? Nope.
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
Actually science hasn't entirely excluded it given the steps being made with Quantum physics. I think even Einstein and, I think Bergmann, were working on a theory for what they called the '5th' dimension which they did scrap even though they were making advances with it.
What if the 'soul' cannot be observed here? What if the light is out of the visible spectrum that we can observe?
Still so little we know. It is limiting potential to rule it out now.edit on 10-8-2012 by LightAssassin because: Note to self: Stop ATS'ing while semi-pissed