Hebrew Alphabet is based on the Star of David..

What do you think ATS? Anyone noticed this before?

Wow, that is no joke! It reminds me of other ways some alphabets are made. Super-kudos to you sir. Yet another reason I love ATS. How did you come up with that?

reply to post by TheMatrixusesYou


Read my custom title. Wisdom and knowledge is my true love in this world.

reply to post by VeritasAequitas


Yea, I reacted too fast as I was too flustered to see that detail. After my post I immediately realized my error.

At a young age, I'd learned in church that Solomon was the wisest man who'd ever lived and I wanted to be THAT ever since. Truth I long for and if I have to struggle to get it then so be it.

reply to post by TheMatrixusesYou


He has an interesting name.

SOL, is an ancient Roman word for the Sun, while OM/AUM is the mystical sanskrit sound of the ajna chakra(third eye), and ON is a Chaldean/Egyptian word used as the Biblical name of Heliopolis in the bible, all relating to the Sun.

That is very impressive even though that some might already know about it. never the less it is new to me and thanks for posting. s/f

reply to post by VeritasAequitas


Are you yet a member of any societies that can help you in your endeavors? I know that just sounded weird, but seriously?

some don't quiet fit.. I think you could do that with the Latin alphabet and the star of david, too and you would have just some slight variations.

So no, not really..

reply to post by TheMatrixusesYou


I am filing my petition to become a Freemason at my local lodge next Thursday. I attend the School of Mind, learning whatever I wish to know. I am interested in a great number of societies outside of Freemasonry.

reply to post by Hellas


I think/thought they all looked pretty legit. Care to point out which ones don't really match?

Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Hellas

 

I think/thought they all looked pretty legit. Care to point out which ones don't really match?

Sure. First Box #3 and #7 and #1 in the last one for example

Originally posted by VeritasAequitas

What do you think ATS? Anyone noticed this before?

edit on 10-8-2012 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)

Bit of a stretch, even for you.

reply to post by Hellas


Maybe not exactly, but I think enough to the point that it is A) Interesting to note why they would make an alphabet consisting of 22 characters derived from one of their most revered symbols, B) Still used to help teach/learn Hebrew.

reply to post by DeadSeraph


I suppose it could be coincidence...I doubt it though, I don't think I'm reaching. But you are more than welcome and titled to your opinion.

/E: Like come on, most of those are dead on, while a few are only slightly off due to using a perfect Star model.

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

Originally posted by VeritasAequitas

Bit of a stretch, even for you.

Why would you say that?

Originally posted by TheMatrixusesYou

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

Originally posted by VeritasAequitas

Bit of a stretch, even for you.

Why would you say that?

This ^^

I repeat; A good majority of these are dead on, with the ones that don't quite match being due to using the perfect star model for illustration and not character script. How is that considered stretching or reaching?

reply to post by VeritasAequitas


Are you familiar with the Meru Foundation? This guy, Stan Tenen, blows my mind!



www.meru.org...

reply to post by VeritasAequitas


No I was asking Deadseraph why he'd say that. Though I soon have to go to bed, I can help you with a question you had about another thread...

Originally posted by TheMatrixusesYou

Originally posted by DeadSeraph

Originally posted by VeritasAequitas

Bit of a stretch, even for you.

Why would you say that?

Because he is breaking the alphabet up as he wants to see it within the star of david. He's seeing what he wants to see. Simple as that. The Hebrew alphabet is an extremely interesting and (imo) powerful thing, but this isn't even close to being reasonable unless you want it to be reasonable.

reply to post by DeadSeraph


Pretty sure I couldn't see a pink elephant in this picture if I tried, but okay....