It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Ohio: Extra Voting Time - For Republicans Only!

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 12:11 PM
Ohio Virginia Indiana and Wisconsin
are the mega battlegrounds and the Republicans
are willing to lie cheat and disenfranchise to ensure
You know, like the Founding Fathers would have wanted.

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 12:23 PM

Originally posted by murphy22
reply to post by OutKast Searcher


I said it should be state wide.
But I have no doubt that there is some reason they (Republicans) brought it up.

Who did this idea have to go through?
Was it voted on?
If so any Dems vote for it?
Is there a review?
Are these counties rural with less voting booths? All kinds of qestions arise.

Because you make it sound dumb doesn't make it so.

And all your questions are answered if you'd watched the piece or read the local news articles on the subject. Yes, it is as brazen as it appears and there is zero justification. It is 100% about attempting to limit the voting access of their opposition.

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 01:38 PM
Sadly this is no longer surprising.

-------------Breaking News------------------

After a quick search I came across a conversation between a Mr Arthur Dent, (Democrat voter) and Ohio's Republican Secretary of State, Jon Husted.

I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find it.”
“That’s the Polling Station.”
“With a flashlight.”
“Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”
“So had the stairs.”
“But look, you found it, didn’t you?”
“Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

All due praise to Mr Douglas Adams

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 01:46 PM
Republican "voter supression" eh that is rich coming from the people who get union thuggery to suppress votes,felons to vote, and dead people to vote, and illegals. to vote.

And who are the ones who are trying to supress the miltary vote?

That would be the Democrats

The reason the Democrats are interested in suppressing the military vote is obvious on its face. Active duty military and retired veterans tend to support Republican candidates more the Democrats, as suggested by polling from both the 2004 election and the 2008 election. The fewer servicemen and women are allowed to vote, the better President Obama's chances of being re-elected are.

So how the hell does the left have any room to talk?
edit on 10-8-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 01:54 PM
reply to post by neo96

You're using Mark whittington as a source?

This Mark Whittington?

At the same time, a President Palin would strike at the enemies of the United States, such as Iran, and assist her friends with a whole panoply of tools

Mark Whittington: Sarah Palin a Modern Cold War Hero In The Making.

Tools being the operative word

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 01:58 PM
reply to post by BritofTexas

There are multiple sources buy hey who really cares there was a lot more to that post that is well known to everyone.

For anyone trying to claim the "moral high ground" is disingenous the left has a long history of voter suppression

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 02:09 PM
reply to post by neo96

WND is your source...

The same WND that pushed birtherism, and is now pushing one of the most outlandish "theories" yet; Obama in a gay marriage to a Pakistani.

So Now, Obama Was Gay Married To A Pakastani? Thanks WND! (VIDEO)

Yeah, real "news" source there, neo. WND literally invents new tripe every day.

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 02:13 PM
reply to post by Blackmarketeer

No it wasn' the only source but hey what do i expect from people who cry that asking for ID is voter suppression that same thing they need to have when they go sign up for their welfare and other crap and go to a bank to have other peoples cash direct deposited.


posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 02:20 PM
reply to post by neo96

Any of these "Multiple Sources" not Right Wing propaganda?

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 03:01 PM
How long has this "Law" been on the books ?

The one that says the Sec of State has the final say ?

Are the Democrats going to sue ?

posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 06:38 PM
reply to post by Blackmarketeer

wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww... How can anyone take WND seriously?.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in