 |
|
Topic started on 11-10-2004 @ 09:08 AM by mikesingh
|
I've read somewhere that our Moon is hollow! Convincing arguments have been put forth including one that says that probably it is a huge artificial
satellite put into orbit by a civilization millions of years ago! Wow! That sounds like hard core science fiction. But perhaps could it be true.....??
Looking for answers!!
[edit on 11-10-2004 by mikesingh]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-10-2004 @ 09:29 AM by kinglizard
|
You may get some information from the following threads.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-10-2004 @ 02:23 PM by Cyborgwitch
|
Wasn't one of Mars' moons also supposed to be hollow, or in any case extremely light? Think it was Phobos, I'm not sure, though.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-10-2004 @ 03:06 PM by tongues of fire
|
you may find clementine photos helpful, i saw one taken of southern pole region of the moon that may lend credence to the hollow theory. sorry i
don't recall the link. interestingly enough there is a photo on the cover of an old rand mcnally atlas that has a very curious depiction of the
northern polar region of the earth, mostly cloudless, that appeared to me to have a giant opening. i'll see if i can find some linx.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-10-2004 @ 03:10 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 04:08 AM by mikesingh
|
Thanks! That was helpful.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 04:47 AM by NaturalManiac
|
Originally posted by Cyborgwitch
Wasn't one of Mars' moons also supposed to be hollow, or in any case extremely light? Think it was Phobos, I'm not sure, though. 
Yeah, I recognize that as well. I even think it was Carl Sagan and a russian scientist who proposed that idea though I might remember wrong.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 01:25 PM by victor was right
|
i recall reading something called OUR MYSTERIOUS SPACESHIP MOON by two soviet guys [astronauts?] . it set forth what i thought were persuasive
arguments supporting the hollow moon theory.
even if it's all lunacy  and the moon is solid, i still believe there are immense voids deep within it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 01:37 PM by Der Kapitan
|
I'm re-reading this book and it has a good overview of the Moon-is-a-spaceship/station thing. Interesting read.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 01:52 PM by Byrd
|
Uhm... no, it's not extremely light and no, Sagan didn't propose that. I don't think it has any support at all in the scientific community. I've
seen it as the "plot" of some fiction but no credible evidence.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 01:55 PM by Der Kapitan
|
The idea was that the moon is not as dense as was to be expected, and that it's apparently denser at the outer layers (crust) than the interior
regions. (mantle) This is what supposedly gave rise to the hollow moon theory.
[edit on 13-10-2004 by Der Kapitan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2004 @ 01:56 PM by sardion2000
|
Originally posted by Byrd
Uhm... no, it's not extremely light and no, Sagan didn't propose that. I don't think it has any support at all in the scientific community. I've
seen it as the "plot" of some fiction but no credible evidence. 
Actually Byrd, an astronomer some 60 years ago proposed the idea that Mars's moon(s? how many moons does mars have??) might be artificial because
they were much too light. Then the same guy debunked his own theory a couple years later, after checking his results. I think it was an error in his
calculations/observations. Forget his name though... couldn't have been Sagan though....
EDIT: I think it was a Russian Astonomer
[edit on 13-10-2004 by sardion2000]
[edit on 13-10-2004 by sardion2000]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-10-2004 @ 02:14 AM by ThunderCloud
|
Originally posted by sardion2000
Actually Byrd, an astronomer some 60 years ago proposed the idea that Mars's moon(s? how many moons does mars have??) might be artificial because
they were much too light. Then the same guy debunked his own theory a couple years later, after checking his results. I think it was an error in his
calculations/observations. Forget his name though... couldn't have been Sagan though... 
Mars has two moons, Phobos and Demios. Both are irregularly shaped, non-spherical moons. Most astronomers think they were asteroids from the asteroid
belt that got trapped in Mars' orbit as they flew by it long ago.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |