reply to post by Haknow
my signature shows that you are a human. because you are concerned about people's rights. but I see many people that see an Islamic government the
same as theocracy of Medieval I just want to clarify that:
differences between Islamic government and theocracy in christianity::
as Iran has a special kind of islamic government that is based on shia doctrines but these are common in Islam not just related to shia.
1-no forced government is allowed in Islam doctrine. a forced government is nothing but dictatorship. even the prophets can not rule over people by
force. these are people that choose their rulers. Jesus could not make a government because people did not gather around him but Solomon and the
prophet of Islam could make a government.
so the leader in Iran should get elected and supervised by the so called assembly of experts that the members of it is elected directly by people
every 8 years. leader is not an executive part. but presidency which is elected every four years is executive.
the ottoman empire is not regarded Islamic and also the Caliph governments in some arab countries. they are Inheritable kingdoms.
2-in Jihad no one can start a war. and the war is only against the aggressor governments not the nations.
from Khomeini testament:"""During the short span of time since the triumph of the Revolution people have seen such agents under the titles
"mujahid-e-khalq" (a Jihadist group that now is known as MKO and even west does not bother to recognize it as a terrorist group just because it is
against Iran like Jundullah group) ..."""
3-no one is allowed to mimic the basics of his religion even if he or she is born in a family with special beliefs. so believe in God, the last day
and the prophets and the religions are something that a person should figure it out on his own. he should choose one he thinks is true but not
destructing others beliefs.
4- Are not there any wrong clerics in Iran!? of course there Are.
even Khomeini warned about that""""We are aware that the superpowers have implanted in various communities agents in different disguises such as:
"nationalists', 'pan-Iranists" ...(78), 'liberals", 'intellectuals", "spiritualists" and "RELIGIOUS JURISTS". THIS LAST group if given the opportunity
are the MOST insidious and harmful. Such agents live, sometimes for decades, among nations with patience, Islamic conduct and deportment""""
clerics can not come to power unless people vote for them in presidency or parlement members like every other ordinary people. especially with the
events of 2008 elections people now know that Khomeini was right (I hope so), wrong clerics are the most dangerous !
5- some people think that there are sitting in their court to execute people especially women. but execution is a hard and rare punishment that is
passed in court for hard crimes and there is no difference between men or women !
anyhow I praise your idea that foreign obligation is not the solution.
edit on 8-8-2012 by maes2 because: (no reason
edit on 8-8-2012 by maes2 because: (no reason given)