posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 12:22 AM
You guys HAVE to see the irony in Druscilla's post basically saying "I wouldn't touch a UFO book, after all, how could I lay my hands on something
so unsubstantiated by myself? I REFUSE to read books on UFOs, instead I read books on psychology.....because after all, psychology is REAL, and UFOS
are not". Of course, she tried to sound intelligent while basically stating that.
Here is the thing....UFOs are proven to exist. As the poster in here said, how can anyone doubt them? They do, in fact, exist. That is verifiable. As
to the NATURE of UFOs....well , yes, all we have right now is THEORY. Theory, much like what we have in PSYCHOLOGY.
Anyone who has truly studied sociology, and psychology in an academic setting knows that these themselves can be considered psuedo-science, and there
is certainly no unified theory of psychology....it is all rather subjective, much like the theories regarding UFOs.
While I agree that it might be beneficial to have at least a basic understanding of psychology while entering the domain of ufology.....to simply
state that you refuse to read any works on ufology because it would somehow "taint" your own research, is beyond insane.
You can not blame the works of others for the misalignment within your own perceptions. Each and every researcher and investigator needs to have their
own clear, concise, and valid methods for developing theories and validating them.