It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
That is not a "simpler" answer in the slightest...
How on Earth (pardon the pun) can the earth gain that much mass?
Originally posted by CaptChaos
The only possible explanations are: gravity was somehow less back then, or the Earth was smaller, as in the Expanding Earth theories.
Originally posted by Megapixel
reply to post by eriktheawful
The Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction (GTME) posits that the 3 core elements moved off-center and away from Pangea. In a simplified view, think of them moving without any change in volume or shape.
thank you!! god!!! my head was about to explode while waiting to read all this stupidity.before replying with the same answer.some people need to lay off the crack.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by CaptChaos
It's true that with even the LEAST BIT of research, such as a quick Google search, you will find out this is TRUE. Not the ten foot unicorns, the FACT that an elephant is about as big as it can get.
No it isn't, Mammoths were bigger along with a great many of the mega fauna of only a few thousand years ago, like the giant Rhino, some species of which were bigger than mammoths and that is without the added oxygen of the Triassic or Jurassic periods. (interestingly, the Triassic extinction event saw a drop in oxygen levels which killed off a large amount of the big dino's)
It isn't a fact at all that gravity would prevent such large animals as the oxygen count in the atmosphere (over double today's levels) would have made it much easier to do the same amount of work.
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by CaptChaos
The only possible explanations are: gravity was somehow less back then, or the Earth was smaller, as in the Expanding Earth theories.
Several good discussions about that here on ATS. I think I've been involved in a few. Count me in as a skeptical believer that it's a possibility.
The Expanding Earth hypothesis
Growing earth theory explains a few things
Originally posted by Megapixel
reply to post by eriktheawful
Your analysis is not correct. You stated:
"The amount of gravitational acceleration that one feels on the surface of a planet would not change, even if you moved the center of the planet's mass from off center. "
By definition, the center of mass (COM) of an object is the point at which one can consider the total mass of the object to be located at. Therefore, for the purpose of calculating the surface gravity at a point on the surface of the Earth, the distance from the COM to the point on the surface is used. It is clear that using Newton's equation for gravity would result in a lowering of surface gravity at a point (i.e., on Pangea) as the core elements moved away from Earth-centricity and away from Pangea. All three core elements comprise a total of approx. 80-85% of the Earth's mass.
No change in the amount of mass of the Earth is necessary for this change in surface gravity. Just about everybody is under the false impression that a change in the Earth's mass or volume is necessary to change surface gravity. That is why no one has been able to explain the gigantism of dinosaurs and other life forms in the past before the Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction. The mass of the Earth has changed very little over the past few hundred of millions of years.