It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
I'm all for freedoms as long as they don't take away from anyone else's. Currently the church is trying to keep freedoms from the homosexual's that straight people have, which equals discrimination and would be labeled as bigotry. We should just actually have a seperation of church and state in this country, and serious reprecussions for the 'HATE' groups that try to rob freedoms from others.
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
reply to post by Believer101
Then you have no problem with teaching intelligent design in the classroom? You should be "tolerant" of those views.
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Originally posted by NoJoker13
I'm all for freedoms as long as they don't take away from anyone else's. Currently the church is trying to keep freedoms from the homosexual's that straight people have, which equals discrimination and would be labeled as bigotry. We should just actually have a seperation of church and state in this country, and serious reprecussions for the 'HATE' groups that try to rob freedoms from others.
You mean it is now a right to believe in intelligent design? In public schools? Or, is that right robbed from students to see alternative views?
Originally posted by The Benevolent Adversary
reply to post by troubleshooter
wow nice assumption about my sexual proclivites and nice way to avoid my honest question.
where does jesus specifically address the issue of homosexuality?
Originally posted by Agoyahtah
Originally posted by The Benevolent Adversary
reply to post by troubleshooter
wow nice assumption about my sexual proclivites and nice way to avoid my honest question.
where does jesus specifically address the issue of homosexuality?
Jesus was busy casting out demons, healing the sick, spreading the good word, and teaching his disciples the mysteries of the kingdom of God. Homosexuality wasn't a big thing back then, the entire population of the earth was a lot smaller, and if there were any gays, they were too few in number to get onto Jesus' radar.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Just because others are liberated from the idea that all sex is sinful does not mean they focus on the flesh and forgo the mind and the heart.
Originally posted by Agoyahtah
In this case, it is clear that Jesus' position is "abstinence" , i.e. non-sexual relation, is the best form of "love".
So, that would exclude homosexuals immediately, since they must have sex with each other, otherwise they wouldn't be homosexuals at all. Other Christians of the day did comment on homosexuality, but these were not the direct words of Jesus.
Originally posted by Agoyahtah
They are not liberated. They are "bonded" to sex, and therefore wish to change the language to redefine good and evil to suit their fancy, to support and celebrate their activity, and to take pride in sin. Instead of shame, they have become "numb" from feeling, and have no clue what is love at all.
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
reply to post by Believer101
Isn't homosexuality taught as a "perfectly normal" "Non sexual deviance" in public schools?
Isn't the subject of intelligent design not allowed in same public schools?
Calling homosexuality what it is, is not hateful.
It is a sexual deviance and human beings were not designed to "love" "produce" and "multiply" in same sex cohabitation. It is a biological deviance. Period.
Shouldn't one's 1st amendment rights to practice and exercise their religion trump anyone else's attempt to shove a socio-political movement down people's throats?
Especially when used to misguide children?
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
reply to post by Believer101
Isn't homosexuality taught as a "perfectly normal" "Non sexual deviance" in public schools? Isn't the subject of intelligent design not allowed in same public schools?
Calling homosexuality what it is, is not hateful. It is a sexual deviance and human beings were not designed to "love" "produce" and "multiply" in same sex cohabitation. It is a biological deviance. Period.
Shouldn't one's 1st amendment rights to practice and exercise their religion trump anyone else's attempt to shove a socio-political movement down people's throats? Shouldn't that type of indoctrination be called out? Especially when used to misguide children?
Should we allow blind people their "right" to obtain a drivers license?
Is it hateful to deny the "rights" to the blind that we allow everyone else?
Using your logic, the answer would be yes