I mean its inevitable really, what with after the whole "faked" moon debacle and what not.
You mean faked "moon landings".
There are only four types of people who deny that the 'moon landings' were faked.
1) Those who do not have much sense, and do not understand how things work and who do not have a clue on just how serious a problem radiation would be
in space (for example).
2) Those who have not researched the matter very well (or at all). They rather 'receive' information from the idiot box and mainstream media,
because it's so trustworthy and respectable, and represents a true authority to these people.
3) Those who very well know it was faked, but who are paid to keep the truth from leaking out, and whose job it is to ridicule anyone speaking the
truth about almost any controversial subject. The masses have been so painstakingly duped about so many basic things (free energy, UFOs, moon
landings, wars, assasinations, money, taxes, law, legal system, history, physics, etc. etc. etc. etc. ad infinitum, almost), that they REALLY DON'T
want all that mess to become untangled and clear to people. They want to keep people asleep, comfortably tucked in with these lies and disinformation.
The 'dogma' has to be believed by the majority, so the truthspeakers must be ridiculed very powerfully and efficiently. Every psychological and
emotional method is to be used among whatever else the situation warrants. The 'moon landing' hoax is just one piece of the puzzle - but if they
let that go, then all the other things will be questioned too, and before long, the whole house of cards will come crashing down. This is what these
people try to prevent.
4) Those that simply refuse to accept the truth, because they are emotionally and psychologically too invested in the lie. They will blind themselves
from any fact or contradiction in NASA's stories, as long as they don't have to face the obvious truth. They are underhanded, sneaky, and avoid
direct answers to difficult questions. They don't WANT it to be true that it was all a hoax, so they don't let themselves to face that truth. They
are like the main character in the movie 'Memento' - they will rather lie to themselves than even consider the truth as a possibility.
So, fellow ATS users - which group of PANs do you belong to?
Or are you one of the more intelligent type, those who actually research before starting to claim things, and who have found out, however
disappointingly, that NASA certainly never sent any men to the moon in the 60's or later?
The choice is yours.
My point is that the evidence is so overwhelming that only an ostrich-type denier can really claim that NASA sent anyone even close to the Van Allen
belts, let alone to the surface of the moon .. AND BACK. They can't even do it in 2012! (It's still 2012 in reality, although the gregorian calendar
I mean, anyone equipped with average intelligence (or higher), who really, objectively, truthfully and truly immerses oneself with ALL AVAILABLE
EVIDENCE, and uses their brains, critical thinking, ponders all angles (like why russians never did it, although they were 'light years' ahead of
USA in the so-called 'space race', and the discussions about how heavy shielding would be required, etc.. the Soviets really did have these
discussions - why would they have, if Van Allen belt is as harmless as NASA claims - very thin aluminium wall is sufficient to protect everyone?
Really?) and only then comes to a conclusion, must realize how lunatic NASA's claims about sending men on the moon and back really are.
I have read the arguments from both sides, and PANs seem like evil harassers, who are not even interested in listening to the other side or answering
their questions, and keep repeating their lies and debunked arguments, while the other side seems to be sincere, able to present a LOT of facts and
contradictions, anomalies and peculiarities concerning NASA's video footage, photos, claims, 'facts' and behaviour - including the mysteriously
disappeared technical data files, reels, and everything concerning the supposed moon flights there and back. Suddenly there is absolutely no clear
data about any of that? How convenient.
NASA stinks like a rotten fish, filled with cat turds - and the more one researches, the harder it becomes to even take seriously almost anything they
To the naive individual, who has obviously not researched anything, and who simply trusts that GPS must be satellites, and that because he has a cell
phone, NASA must have found already a way to magically defeat the problem of Van Allen belts, solar flares, and other deadly problems that space
radiation alone (let alone ther other problems) causes..
.. I can only recommend more thorough research, and logical thinking instead of trusting.