Pin colony real executing correlate.

Sweet.

I needed another soon-to-be-failed prediction to keep me occupied! ATS never disappoints!

Originally posted by Chibbols
They won't be as strong as he says.... the one in Australia will be some sort of rebound or backslash from the main one, that will happen near the New Madrid area... a big one is due in that area, and TPTB are waiting for the right time to boost its power by man made means, just like they did with Fukushima.

You guys will probably feel a quake, and suddenly a large shockwave, like a BOOM. It will feel like a sudden vertical motion rather than horizontal swinging/rattling.
Expect some volcanoes to show some activity, even at the Atlantic side...

Keep an eye on MCEs and the ocean tides, and their conjunction. That will help you get an idea of when there is a bigger chance of earthquakes and where they will take place. Guide yourself with a map of fault lines and tectonic plates to pinpoint the right areas.
=on&date=20120807

In either case, do not be afraid of what may or may not happen... knowing what to do in case it hits is all you need to worry about. Even if nothing happens, it is important to spread the word about what to do and what to have always ready in an emergency backpack.

Well where we live if we don't have days notice we are done for. The roads out are up/down the coast and inland along a river which would be as flooded as the coast and the bridge would be gone. If we already feel a quake it is probably to late to pass the bridge and it would be backed up by vehicles anyway.

81 flags as of this post, wow just wow, I as well was one of the people who feel taken for a ride, bye young mitchell, see this young man came here talked all sorts of stuff then just disappears. Now I am one to take everything with a grain of salt so I heed the possibility of there being something to happen. But to once again follow a charleton and throw flags and stars at predictions seems foolish even for the ATS crowd. But yet I digress cause 81 flags and numerous stars later, seems we have the pack on board again. Mr Coombs I applaud your ability to cause a stir..... LoL

SaneThinking

Try for yourself.

Mine said "Geology". I've been thinking about big earthquakes for the last few days - I hope this guy is not right about this one, but after his last prediction - we'll have to see.

I have been lurking on Coombes fb since the Japan quake and saw on his page where he accurately predicted what was to come for the Japanese on the 11th.

Just took a glance at his page again and still no 104 hr warning. He says days?? I am about to read the comments though....

He is a poker player, a young man, believes in God, and also believes whole heartedly in Haarp.

Do I believe he holds some inside info? Maybe he does but Im still not ready to jump on his band wagon without knowing theres a seat available.

It appears there havs been an uptick in activity regarding Ca. Earthquakes but this is the norm... To be expected.

I saw people on this thread talking about outside influences. Space weather comes to mind. We are to begin seeing more and more meteor showers and peaking on the 12 and 13th from left over debris from comet tuttle ( if I remember correctly). Not sure this would have anything what so ever to do with the double quake/ tsunami??

I'm betting matey is going to give his 104hr warning sometime in between 15hours 10mins - 16hours 40mins from now.

Or 12:30pm - 2pm August 8th GMT

Originally posted by bastet11
Well this is certainly interesting.
My son (almost 6 years old) was playing on the floor with his toys and had created a disaster scene. This was Saturday morning (8/4).
I asked him what was going on, he told me "A tsunami came and destroyed Daytona Beach."
I laughed for a second, because it sounded so odd coming from a little kid, and being that I had no idea he even knew what Daytona Beach was. But it weirded me out a lot, and I asked him what had made the tsunami and he told me "Australia blew up!" He specified that there was no lava.

I swear I am not joking or lying.
Now, he is a little more morbid then kids his age and he does know what a tsunami is. He is obsessed with natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and storms. He has also drawn me a picture (last year) of the Golden Gate Bridge coming down and has fairly prophetic dreams. He makes me check out books for him at the library of natural disasters. I suppose it is possible he just has these scenarios in his head a lot, but combined with this thread, and our location (Southern California), I must admit I am a little on edge now.

Strange, to say the least.

edit..I asked him again to clarify without leading on, he said actually, there might have been lava. He said there was an explosion.

edit on 7-8-2012 by bastet11 because: (no reason given)

I too had a dream, I have mentioned several times on threads because it was so very different and felt so strange.

Only one word was spoken in the whole dream.

I saw a man, his face int eh dark, he was holding a kid, I could only see the legs the rest in the dark, looked like a girl about 10 yrs old.

I thought she was surly to heavy to hold. In his other hand I was unable to see was a big baby boy, he turned and laid the baby in my shopping card without a word.

The baby was very odd, he was very big for a baby and his head way to big for the body and his head was a rectangle, it was flat on all sides and only about 2 in thick, he was a putty color wrinkled and very ugly.

I thought strange that he would trust a stranger like that, but his burdens are so heavy I thought, I am so glad he felt he could trust me.



The man said 77 days and I immediately woke up and went and wrote the date on the calendar. it came if I counted right to August 26-27 depending on if I counted the night of the dream.

Please don't ridicule me for this post.
Assuming for three seconds he is correct.

I live in the PNW of Washington State, roughly 40 miles inland as a crow flies at an elevation of 243 ft. With the Willapa Hills in which the highest point is 3087 ft, I couldn't find the average elevation but I would say around 900 feet between myself and the ocean. Essentially I live in the valley between the Olympic Mountains and Willapa Hills.

My first question is, his prediction states the resulting tsunamis could reach 70 miles inland. With the hills elevation and what not, is it possible for the tsunami to reach this far (I would expect flooding via the many rivers)?

Number Two, if said tsunami reaches this far does it seem inconceivable that the valley I live in would get filled like a bathtub because it would get trapped between the Olympics and the hills?

Number Three, he states that the quakes will take place in California but myself living so close to the CSZ can't help but wonder what kind of damage three quakes 9.0+ on the Richter scale could cause to my area and surrounding areas. Any thoughts?

Those are the only questions I can think of at the moment.
If this happens step one would definitely be getting the hell out of my 100+ Non-Reinforced Masonry Brick Building.

I think a boat would be more appropriate, for a tsunami,

Not chiming in on either side, just thought I'd chime in about Tsunamis...

Originally posted by Ironclad
Any 1000ft or higher Tsunami crossing an ocean, will only be a few meters high when it reaches the other side.

Out in the deep ocean, you won't have a 1,000 ft Tsunami, it may even be imperceptible to anyone who it passes. Also, waves keep an awful lot of their energy travelling through water. Many studies have found waves formed in Alaska keep up to 90% of their energy when they hit Antarctica!.. The wave only gains height when in shallow water and it also slows down...

Originally posted by Ironclad
Dose not mean they will be less dangerous though, in fact quite the opposite. As the Tsunami travels further, it loses height but gains speed.

Not true. In deep water, it can travel across the ocean almost as strong as it when it was generated, the deeper the water, the faster it goes. It loses speed when it hits shallow water and the amplitude increases (wave height). A Tsunami out at sea might only produce a slight swell, going unnoticed. When it gets the shore, that's where the danger lies, made worse by the shape of the coastline which can funnel the wave and increase the amplitude further.

Don't assume for one minute that a tsunami in Cali won't bother Aus, it most certainly will. Ocean waves are very good at retaining energy. There is a potential landslip in the Canaries that could generate a huge wave which poses a danger solely to the US eastern seaboard, potentially causing a wave hundreds of metres high...