It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perhas you can explain to me what "psychic phenomena" you think is taking place - because as far as I can see the paper is talking about a MODEL.......not any actual phenomena at all.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Man, I'm not sure what to say. You are simply not correctly assessing the information available.
It's right there plain as day for people to see. Even your explanation seems to indicate it's of a psychic nature.
I've seen you do this same kinda thing in so many threads...it's just weird.
I've never truly thought anyone here was a disinfo agent, but seriously??
It not only says "model" but it describes numerous experiments, and the results of these.
If you can't infer what this means....wow!
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by longlostbrother
reply to post by milkyway12
Idiots believing stupid crap is not the same thing as it being true.
There's absolutely NO proof for psychic powers. None.
There's no proof that gravity exists either, but there sure are a lot of "idiots" who buy that one.
There are several aspects of gravity that don't make any sense at all, but that doesn't stop people from believing in its existence.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Dude, relying on the logical fallacy of a strawman only reveals your willingness to deceive and one has to wonder why since you are clearly backpedaling.
I never claimed this study proved a thing. You asked for "feel free to offer some verifiable evidence to support them" and this is what I've done, and it is strong enough evidence to get you to back of this remark: "I'm quite sure you are completely wrong" and instead make this statement: "Now this may ideed be a first step along explaining or showing what psychic poweres actuall are and that they exist and how they work." So why you are now throwing "proof" into the mix is dubious at best.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Man, I'm not sure what to say. You are simply not correctly assessing the information available.
It's right there plain as day for people to see. Even your explanation seems to indicate it's of a psychic nature.
this isn't verifiable evidence - it is a model construct.
sorry you find that difficult to understand, but no longer surprised.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Please allow me a little time to search the numerous references cited within the document.
I understand being skeptical towards seemingly outrageous claims, but at some point one must be willing to admit fault.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
this isn't verifiable evidence - it is a model construct.
sorry you find that difficult to understand, but no longer surprised.
Then you reject the Theory of Relativity for the same reason, I suppose. Clearly you reject the Big Bang Theory for the same reason. You obviously reject Darwinism for the same reason.
I doubt you are sorry at all,
and suspect you know full well I do not have any difficulties understanding what you're saying. I wonder if you'll answer directly whether or not you willingly call the Theory of Relativity completely wrong, or the Big Bang Theory, or Darwinism, or AGW, for their lack of verifiable evidence?
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I'm okay with that, but I guess you'd have to describe what qualifies as "verifiable evidence".
Something which can be reproduced in a controlled environment?
Like you for example. There is ample proof thqt gravity exists - try jumping up and see if you fall down again.
and of course you completley misrepresent what that article says - it says that this scientist thinks that Gravity does not exist as a force in its own right - rather that it is is result of various other forces that exist - much like heat is actually a result of eth energy level of matter, and not somethign that actually exists as a seperate "entity", even though we often treat it as such.
“For me gravity doesn’t exist,” said Dr. Verlinde, who was recently in the United States to explain himself. Not that he can’t fall down, but Dr. Verlinde is among a number of physicists who say that science has been looking at gravity the wrong way and that there is something more basic, from which gravity “emerges,” the way stock markets emerge from the collective behavior of individual investors or that elasticity emerges from the mechanics of atoms.
lol - things that dont' make sense aer not things that say it doesn't exist - they are things for which wee do nto have a full understanding, or possible a mistaken understanding of. do you deliberately misrepresent this stuff, or do you really not understand what it is??
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Please allow me a little time to search the numerous references cited within the document.
I understand being skeptical towards seemingly outrageous claims, but at some point one must be willing to admit fault.
I need to eat dinner, but will be sure to come back later with a full response.edit on 6-8-2012 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
“We have an exceptional opportunity to put such tales to practical test,” he told them. “The subject believes fully any statement made by the operator. I shall tell Miss Freeman that she is to exert her will power, and rise up off the floor. It is certain that she will believe that she can do it. Her will will be in an optimum condition to carry out the order, if it can be done. Miss Freeman!”
“Yes, Mr. Huxley.”
“Exert your will. Rise up in the air!”
Joan rose straight up into the air, some six feet— until her head nearly touched the high ceiling. —“How’m doin,’ pal?”—Swell, kid, you’re wowin ‘em. Look at ‘em stare!”
At that moment Brinkley burst into the room, rage in his eyes.
“Mr. Huxley, you have broken your word to me, and disgraced this university!” It was some ten minutes after the fiasco ending the demonstration. Huxley faced the president in Brinkley’s private office.
“I made you no promise. I have not disgraced the school,” Phil answered with equal pugnacity.
“You have indulged in cheap tricks of fake magic to bring your department into disrepute.”
“So I’m a faker, am I? You stiff-necked old fossil-explain this onel” Huxley levitated himself until he floated three feet above the rug.
“Explain what?” To Huxley’s amazement Brinckley seemed unaware that anything unusual was going on. He continued to stare at the point where Phils head had been. His manner showed nothing but a slight puzzlement and annoyance at Huxley’s apparently irrelevant remark.
Was it possible that the doddering old fool was so completely self-deluded that he could not observe anything that ran counter to his own preconceptions even when it happened directly under his eyes? Phil reached out with his mind and attempted to see what went on inside Brincldey’s head. He got one of the major surprises of his life. He expected to find the floundering mental processes of
66
near senility; he found cold calculation, keen ability, set in a matrix of pure evil that sickened him.
It was just a glimpse, then he was cast out with a wrench that numbed his brain. Brinckley had discovered his spying and thrown up his defences—the hard defences of a disciplined mind.
Phil dropped back to the floor, and left the room, without a word, nor a backward glance.
From THE WESTERN STUDENT, October 3rd:
PSYCH PROF FIRED FOR FRAUD
. . . students’ accounts varied, but all agreed that it had been a fine show. Fullback ‘Buzz’ Arnold told your reporter, “I hated to see it happen; Prof Huxley is a nice guy and he certainly put on a clever skit with some good deadpan acting. I could see how it was done, of course—it was the same the Great Arturo used in his turn at the Orpheum last spring. But I can see Doctor Brinckley’s viewpoint; you can’t permit monkey shines at a serious center of learning.”
President Brinckley gave the STUDENT the following official statement: “It is with real regret that I announce the termination of Mr. Huxley’s association with the institution—for the good of the University. Mr. Huxley had been repeatedly warned as to where his steps were leading him. He is a young man of considerable ability. Let us devoutly hope that this experience will serve as a lesson to him in whatever line of endeavor ...”
Coburn handed the paper back to Huxley. “You know what happened to me?” he inquired.
“Something new?”
“Invited to resign ... No publicity—just a gentle hint. My patients got well too fast; I’d quit using surgery, you know.”
“How perfectly stinking!” This from Joan.
“Well,’ Ben considered, “I don’t blame the medical director; Brinckley forced his hand. I guess we underrated the old cuss.”
AFAIK every investigation of psychics has always turned up either outright fraud or, at best, clever cold reading, but it is refreshing that one of them is willing to own up to it.