posted on Aug, 6 2012 @ 08:06 AM
Because nobody was killed. . # like this happens everyday, especially in America (not a dig). Unless peoples heads are blown off and media can use it
for their agenda, this is not worthy of our attention, so they think.
Theres a huge problem in America, I don't know if the problem is easy accesability to weapons or the people who actually live there.
I know people defend gun owndership by saying they save lives, but where was the gun owners in any of these situations? Why didnt they defuse the
Im genuinly interested in this subject as I believe you can't just take peoples guns off them, its in their constitution, simple as that. Are gun
owners allowed to go into buildings with weapons? Maybe a gun owner hasnt been able to defuse these situations because they werent allowed to bring
their gun into the said building/boat or what ever(?)
Does these restrictions on where you're allowed you're weapon defeat the whole point of been permited to carry weapons?
I'm not derailign your thread, I apolagize if you think I have.
Edit to add:
If i would of been in any of these recent shootings, and I was an armed American citizen (which i would choose to be) Then I would of not hesitated to
blow any of these peoples heads clean off. not messing about, no what if's. If the guy is risking peoples livez, hes getting battered over here, in
America hes getting his head blown off.
Why are gun owners not there to defuse the situation?
edit on 6-8-2012 by n00bUK because: (no reason given)