Martial Law might be declared soon , page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 01:52 AM by jordanAKbramsen
reply to post by muse7



well your going to be very suprised soon. In aniheim a man got shot in the back of the head by police while handcuffed, neighbors got it on camera and cops offered to buy it off them and they said no. The people started protesting and the cops opened fire with rubber bullets killed; Death toll 2. Now there IS martial law going on there, and why?! Because, all those people are awake and ready to make a change!!!


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 04:18 AM by g146541
Originally posted by jordanAKbramsen
reply to
post by muse7



well your going to be very suprised soon. In aniheim a man got shot in the back of the head by police while handcuffed, neighbors got it on camera and cops offered to buy it off them and they said no. The people started protesting and the cops opened fire with rubber bullets killed; Death toll 2. Now there IS martial law going on there, and why?! Because, all those people are awake and ready to make a change!!!

Martial law in Anaheim?
Source please, or do you just mean an increased police presence?


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 10:04 AM by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by Komodo


They have no more right to declare Martial Law after a few isolated instances of mass gun shootings than they do to declare a moratorium on driving after a series of deadly multi-car crashes. I am Not buying it. Even if there is an assassination attempt on The POTUS or an alien invasion and the UN signs an intergalactic treaty there is no "right" to undo our unalienable rights (at least not in this republic).


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 11:20 AM by ArchAngel_X
Throughout history in many counties including the United States and Canada, martial law has been declared in small areas following a disaster, natural or man-made. Many nation's constitutions allow martial law in unique situations to maintain order and public safety in times of emergency.

I could never understand why so many people on this forum seem to fear martial law. It isn't something to be welcomed, but the very mention of it seems to be cause for alarm and I was perplexed. But it finally hit me as I read this thread - and please correct me if I'm wrong: The fear is of a nation-wide declaration of martial law.

The whole United States. All 3 million square miles on the mainland. 350 million people. Many of them armed. Under martial law from coast-to-coast.

It has never happened.
It never will happen.
And even if it does, the armed citizens of your country outnumber your military on such a scale as to make such a declaration a logistical folly. Even without the factor of an armed populace, actively policing such a vast geographical area would practically be impossible, even with a sky full of hijackable drones.

Does one honestly believe that the entire army and law enforcement forces would fall in line behind such an order, either? I have my doubts as it is something that is not ingrained into our Western society. During the Egyptian uprising, where the country had been under virtual martial law for half-a-century, many career soldiers flatly refused to fire upon their own citizens when ordered to by Mubarak's government. And that was from a society that had become used to an active army presence in the streets in day-to-day life.

I would sooner expect China to invade Canada than I would ever see nation-wide martial law implemented within the United States. There are simply too many factors beyond the government's control to ensure that it could be successfully implemented, atleast in this day of age.


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 11:51 AM by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle


It is MARTIAL (as in derived from MARS, the God of War) and relating to the military replacing civilian rule NOT MARSHALL (as in some western sheriff or the Marshall Plan after WW2).


reply posted on 6-8-2012 @ 11:58 AM by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by triune


Sadly you nailed it. And the destruction of NY would also devastate the financial markets (wall street) more than if it was most other cities with the possible exemption of Washington, DC as that would destroy the government structure as well. Either city would destroy icons of liberty (statue of liberty in ny, most landmarks in dc) which would have a psychological affect on the population beyond the death toll. In addition if it was DC and the President was secured elsewhere then he would have no choice but to take over (exec branch over legis) and activate COG contingency plans (Fema zones taking over states as well). "How do You spell (Reichstag)?"
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags