Curiosity Has Landed!!, page 6

Originally posted by plube
Was on nasa site about 30mins ago...looking at the photo gallery...now there was 48 photos....and now when i popped back in there is only 46....I don't know what two have been removed....looking.Nasa

edit on 033131p://f16Monday by plube because: (no reason given)

Oh my! Didn't you ever put up, post, display etc.etc. pictures that AFTER you viewed them, you performed the removal process for maybe 10 different reasons? Oh wait, I know! NASA hoodwinks want to create some drama amongst all the viewers!

reply to post by Kryties

---

They would have to read and actually be interested to know whats going on but they will complain and whine and find a new thread to complain and whine on whthout reading anything.

It does make them look rather silly or maybe stupid yeah thats it they look STUPID!

reply to post by TheCaucasianAmerican

---

black and white !!!???

We had colored photos in 1908.....!!!

Think about that.......

And today in 2012 we have .....black and white photos...

We spend billions and trillions on this tech......and not one person can come up with a colored photo.

New NASA press conference on MSL Curiosity streaming live NOW:

www.ustream.tv...

reply to post by LucidDreamer85

---

Oh FFS. I just answered that above.

And they are talking about the images and why we only have B/W on the livestream now:

www.ustream.tv...

A few hours ago, NASA's HiRISE team announced that it had acquired an image of Curiosity during its epic descent to the Martian surface. That image has originally scheduled to be released at NASA's morning press conference, scheduled for 9:00 am PT, but Spaceflight 101 and Discover magazine are reporting that the image of Curiosity has been leaked. Here is that image, which shows the rover descending toward the surface of the planet via its massive supersonic parachute:

pic and source

reply to post by TheCaucasianAmerican

---

It shouldn't feel manufactured to me but it does. Russia has failed so many Mars missions they shouldn't even be launching anything into orbit. It's honestly very strange to me.

I just feel with all of the observations we have of Mars if there was life there we would know already. It's just hard to fathom how we wouldn't know already. It seems staged to me.

I don't BELIEVE it's staged, but it feels that way sometimes. I have to believe what's in front of my eyes. So I have to believe NASA landed Curiosity on Mars and that they're honest. But I still have this feeling back inside my mind that everything is somehow artificial or unreal. Just bits and pieces of things I read now and then lead me to wonder. Nothing substantial or empirical. This is why it's just a feeling. This is why if asked in-person I'll have to say that NASA is our most reliable source of information. And I'll admit that if they say Curiosity landed then Curiosity landed.

I just get the sense sometimes that they don't want to know if life is on Mars. Sort of like how flat earthers might have a confirmation bias and try to avoid anything that contradicts it. I mean, the only real life detection experiment was the Viking Levin experiment. Since then pretty much nothing. That's the best they can do about detecting life on Mars in 35 years. Nothing.

Reminds me how we landed on the moon and then.... nothing.

They could have worked on much more thorough life detection experiments and sent them to Mars. But no, nope. You can say this is reasonable because the first experiments on Viking failed to detect life. However, it was not a complete failure. Gilbert Levin still thinks they detected life. I think something is going on deeper inside the human level psyche. Something anthropocentric. I remember reading a few years ago a study. In the study they concluded that people who're more likely to think life is elsewhere are less anthropocentric than those who think life elsewhere is less likely. If I could remember the details of the study I'd link it here, but I cannot. My dumb animal brain.

Originally posted by jonnywhite
reply to post by TheCaucasianAmerican

---

I don't BELIEVE it's staged, but it feels that way sometimes. I have to believe what's in front of my eyes. So I have to believe NASA landed Curiosity on Mars and that they're honest. But I still have this feeling back inside my mind that everything is somehow artificial or unreal. Just bits and pieces of things I read now and then lead me to wonder. Nothing substantial or empirical. This is why it's just a feeling. This is why if asked in-person I'll have to say that NASA is our most reliable source of information. And I'll admit that if they say Curiosity landed then Curiosity landed.

You are being asked to believe what NASA tells you. Look into the history of NASA and see if they seem trustworthy to you. You will probably find, like a lot of people, that its the last organisation on earth to put your trust in.

That feeling you have is called intuition and is very powerful.

Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags

Curiosity "ChemCam": 5 little holes and one strange object nearby...
  Posted 15 days ago with 24 member flags

Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags

Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags

Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags

Curiosity sends back first high- resolution colour picture of Mars+First voice ever heard on Mars
  Posted 14 days ago with 20 member flags

Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags

Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: