It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A new ad featuring survivors of the 2011 gun massacre in Tucson are calling out President Obama and Governor Romney for not doing more to prevent gun violence.
Their figures are staggering.
48,000 Americans will be murdered with guns during the next president's term. That's three Aurora shootings every day.
The site DemandAPlan.org, which hosts the ad, also counts the time and gun deaths since James Holmes' rampage.
"Words of condolence are not enough," the site reads, along with a petition
Yes. It is bad. Guns do not cause violence any more than cars cause accidents or spoons cause obesity.
Originally posted by muse7
So implementing more rules on who can get their hands on DEADLY devices is bad?
Only in America.....
Originally posted by muse7
So implementing more rules on who can get their hands on DEADLY devices is bad?
Only in America.....
Look at where they happen. They happen in places where the general populace is not allowed to carry. If guns cause these mass shootings, why do none occur at shooting ranges?
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by DarthMuerte
And armed society is safer?
America has 88 guns for every 100 people
We seem to have a mass shooting every week lol
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Arm everyone. Add weapons training to middle school curriculum. Statistics show that areas with loose gun laws have fewer attacks. An armed society is a polite society.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Arm everyone. Add weapons training to middle school curriculum. Statistics show that areas with loose gun laws have fewer attacks. An armed society is a polite society.
Statistics show that pretty much every country in the world that has gun laws also has much lower incidents of gun related crime.
An armed society is a dangerous society - especially an american armed society.
Really? Try reading your own post again.
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by DarthMuerte
So people in Wisconsin, Arizona and Colorado are not allowed to own weapons?
Funniest thing I've read today
Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"
Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:
Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!
In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre
Colorado is a concealed-carry state, as was Virginia at the time of the Virginia Tech shootings. But like Virginia Tech, according to World Net Daily, the Century 16 theater's parent, Cinemark Holdings Inc., has a strict "gun-free" policy at all of its 459 theaters, even for those who have concealed carry permits.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
It would be impossible for those types of restrictions to work in the US. We already are saturated with guns. Honest people give them up, only criminals will have them.