UPDATE: A family member whose parents were victims of the shooting said his parents told him there were “multiple shooters” involved in a “coordinated” attack.

An eyewitness to the Sikh temple shooting in Wisconsin says that a team of four men dressed in black carried out the massacre, contradicting the official narrative that a lone gunman was the culprit.

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Vitruvian

---

So it couldn't possibly have been a bunch of yahoos who can't tell the difference between a Sikh and a Muslim?

Originally posted by VeniVidi
reply to post by Vitruvian

---

Not sure if this is connected, but I was listening to LIVE Police Scanner during most of the incident. During the broadcast I could hear Officers and Dispatch talking about using "FOUR MAN" teams to search the surrounding area.

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by deadeyedick

---

The physical evidence. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously inaccurate. For example a 1991 study found that in 45% of cases where an innocent person is found guilty it is due to faulty eyewitness testimony. There are other studies that place this number over 50% in the US.

Another example comes from the FBI. During training on of tasks potential agents witness a "crime." After they are asked to state what they saw. I can't remember the exact numbers but most fail this task. Most of these individuals have been trained to observe and even they have trouble accurately remembering what they saw. Do you really think an untrained observer is going to have a better memory of what occurred, especially when they're fearing for their life?