Originally posted by MagnumOpus
Everyone knows he meant RCC, so why do you need to nick-pick. Petty non-sense.

Not necessarily, and I still responded to him, so I wasn't nit-picking -- I wanted to clarify what he meant, on the off chance it was something else.

Well, this thread appears to be going nowhere, and no one seems to want to direct me to a legitimate source that I can review, so I'll leave the three of you to it.

You seldom make sense either.

I listed books as well as encyclopedia citations, which you can't seem to notice.

This was my original comment, which has been supported well.

Originally posted by MagnumOpus
Per the OP, there was definitely a Sun worship theme for religion. Constantine even combined Sun Worship with Jesus that attempt to settle down the battles between the two

All one has to notices is the imagery in the Churches, the Halos, the Sun Bursts, the Painting with such, and Catholic churches built on top of other old worship sites.

Constantine was Sun Worship, as defined by his own Nephew, and his Mom was early Christian, so those two themes came into the RCC imagery and the preaching of the metaphores of religious peaching. It enters in going to church on Sunday, as has been told a thousand times. Jews go in Saturday. It stems from Easter Holidays combined with Death and Resurrection fake story of Jesus, which is Nimrod Sun worship. It enters every churches religion teachings in this manner.

Again, you are playing games and have these intentional ineptitudes that only do to embarrass you and show up a clear agenda to act with denial and pester everyone for things that are highly evident in religious practices to this very day.

Then, everyone knows that Christmas is Nimrod's birthday, and keyed with the Solar issues, and all that is pure Sun worship themes entering the church religion, teachings, and story telling.


Plus, since you can only read from one book, you don't notice the emulation of the story of Jesus to that of Horus, Mythra, and many others, all of which are Sun god related. So, the entire storyline of Jesus appears to have been plagarized from earlier religion concepts akin to Sun and Solar deity worship. And the game of death and resurrection was all about pushing Jesus into that mold of these old Solar Deities.

Originally posted by adjensen

Not necessarily, and I still responded to him, so I wasn't nit-picking -- I wanted to clarify what he meant, on the off chance it was something else.

Well, this thread appears to be going nowhere, and no one seems to want to direct me to a legitimate source that I can review, so I'll leave the three of you to it.

Everyone knows this is your retreat, since all the citations are quite good and relevant to the topic. Trying to save face is so obvious, but so like your other lack of truth stories. Like you always do, everything but the Bible, is dirt in your game on ATS. Someone disagrees with you, they are haters. Someone gives citations that bury your theme, these are not legitinate sources.

You game is diatribe tossing, not recognition and learning.

One can do much with such designation toward ignorance, except point it out.



Just like you don't make the association of RRC with RCC, you also don't even notice things like "Lucifer" in Revelations of the Jerome Latin, or Vulgate translation. Revelations speaks to Jesus being the "Bright Morning Star", and the only bright moning star is the Sun that Rises in the East, which is the same direction the temple faced to see the Bright Morning Star.

So, the Bible translation record speaks to Jesus as lucifer, as translated from he being the "Bright Morning Star", or The Sun.

Revelation 22:16,
"I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you [1] this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star."

So, even Jesus called himself the Sun and the translator Jerome called him lucifer.

Very fitting.

I admit I haven't read this whole thread, but surely the 'sun' and 'son' thing only works in English? The Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek originally.

English is a mash-up of different languages over at least a thousand years. Any 'intentional' use of certain words would require a HUGE conspiracy. I don't believe that, though the OP probably does, and will have references.