Originally posted by LTD602
It's the right to privacy. It's in your Constitution.
Don't walk all over it because you want to know everything that everybody is doing.
The previous attempt to define "secrecy" and/or "secret", is extremely narrow: Secrets do not prima facie suggest any kind of wrongdoing or
ill-intentions.
It's true. I am guilty of narrowing the definition in favor of my argument. Men may also keep secrets from the enemy in time of war so as not to
endanger their nation and or the lives of theri fellow countrymen. They may also keep a secret from another because they know the information would
be harmful and the other would receive no benefit from hearing it. Please feel free to add any other reasons for keeping secrets that you can think
of.
However, in the case of men who are supposed to be the representatives of the United States of America, I do not consider it wise to allow them to
belong to secret societies. Allowing men to hold positions power and influence in government who have sworn an oath of allegiance to organizations or
institutions which have not divulged their intentions, motivations, and goals to the public is dangerous to say the least. Ignorance is not bliss,
and what we don't know can hurt us very, very deeply.
Private citizens have a right to privacy surely. I agree with that entirely. Public servants, however, must be willing to offer something close to
full disclosure. How can I trust a man or woman that I don't know or one whom I've never met and spent time with? How can Americans even begin to
trust the future of their country and the lives of their children to a politican who is keeping important secrets from them?
A few words of wisdom:
"Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help. His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day
his thoughts perish." (KJV Psalms 146:3-4)
One more thing. The constant refrain we have heard ever since the beginning of the Cold War. "National Security, National Security". Because of
this we allow the govenrment to hide all manner of information from the public. Well, here's a thought: perhaps a form of government that cannot
survive without concealing knowledge from its citizens and even blatantly lying to them on several occasions does not deserve to continue. Remember,
the government is not America, America is not the government. America is the people. "We the people", right?
Although self-rule may never have been the reality in this nation outside of propaganda and 'history' textbooks, that is what we in the U.S. are
supposed to believe nowadays. So, since "of the people, by the people, and for the people" is the dream imposed on our imaginations, I say we
impose it upon reality as well.