It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
It would've done much better actually. Slayer is the status quo. ATS loves the status quo, and to complain about a lack of new threads. Self defeating isn't it?
Originally posted by Hanslune
One correction, there are glyphs inside the pyramids
Both the star shafts and the relieving chambers
Reliving chamber glyphs
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Hanslune
One correction, there are glyphs inside the pyramids
Both the star shafts and the relieving chambers
AND That my friends starts a great debate.
Were those originally painted when it was built [Carbon dated?] or painted during the possible "Refurbishing" of the already existing 10,000 BC year old Great Pyramid and Lion into Sphinx done by Khufu at or around 2570 +/- BC?
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes posted on 4-8-2012 @ 02:38 PM
So my post about the sphinx being a celebration of the age of Leo has fallen on deaf ears!? This theory dates the Sphinx to10,000- 8,000 BC and no one has a single comment about it? I'm trying to use logic and insight here and the most of my insightful posts get no response. Yet my one liners get 20 stars. Wish I knew the shaking head smiley...
ETA: Gauranteed my exact theory will pop up in a high profile thread in the near future. I bet ya!
In fact, I bet it is one of the only 'predictions' to ever come true on ATS...
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
The lost city of Mu'a/Mu/Mua/Yonaguni Monument
source
After some time away from the mainstream internet debunkers, the lost city of Mu'a is starting to gain some acceptance in the mainstream archeological world. The newest and popular theory is that early humans may have lived there and adapted the natural rock to their needs.
Efforts to date the monument are derived from the last time the area was above sea level, which would have been approximately 8,000-10,000 years ago– about 3-5 millennia before Egypt’s pyramids were erected. If the monuments were indeed built by humankind, it would require some dramatic revisions to the accepted chronological history of humanity.
Submerged stone structures lying just below the waters off Yonaguni Jima are actually the ruins of a Japanese Atlantis—an ancient city sunk by an earthquake about 2,000 years ago.
That's the belief of Masaaki Kimura, a marine geologist at the University of the Ryukyus in Japan who has been diving at the site to measure and map its formations for more than 15 years.
Originally posted by crawdad1914
Yes, how is it that Sumer, literally sprang up 6000 years ago as a fully functioning society advanced in many ways, but with zero evidence of progression to get to that state? Its like the messopotamians literally sparang up overnight.
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
reply to post by Harte
Elsewhere it says he claims 5,000 years old. Make up your mind people!
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
reply to post by Harte
I didn't log on here to read the same dry debates about Mu, the shoreline, the caves, and the crap.
After some time away from the mainstream internet debunkers, the lost city of Mu'a is starting to gain some acceptance in the mainstream archeological world.
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel You can debate that dead horse with someone else if you like.
Not the point of the thread.
This is not a diving site for beginners, with the ruins located in open waters with high waves and strong currents.
Originally posted by Sulie
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
When our caretakers built them for us. Not to provide shelter or a place of burial, but to comfort our primative minds so we could grow.
Really? Well, I guess one is allowed to believe whatever they want to.
As to my take, it's an insult to humans to delegate us to 'having caretakers." Creative minds have been around for as long as there have been humans.
Suppose somebody with a creative mind saw a meteor shower and wanted to be closer to the heavens to understand what they were seeing? They saw an eclipse, or were awe struck with thunder and lightening from the heavens?
We are inquisitive about what surrounds us in our universe, and have sent many satellites, probes, and even men and women into the heavens.
I personally think you give creative minds no credit for what they could have accomplished without caretakers even thousands, and thousands of years ago.
Originally posted by AnarchysAngel
reply to post by Harte
There's plenty of debate on both sides of the coin. That's not what the thread is about.
You say the shoreline formations are natural. I say stone doesn't errode at straight angles, nor does it crack in such straight lines, and it was clearly quarried.
You say the place sank. I say the oceans rose and the idea of geological activity causing a city to sink is silly.
You say the idea that the site is so old is silly. I say anything that young would have more than a fairytale associated with it.
You say an absence of artifacts found indicates it was never anything important. I say strong currents in the area will quickly remove anything that isn't tied down. The area's difficulty to dive is well documented.
This is not a diving site for beginners, with the ruins located in open waters with high waves and strong currents.
source
You would say those currents are what created Mu. I would say those currents would have created a very different structure, but have probably destroyed most of what was originally there.
Do we really have to do this? AGAIN?