It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Originally posted by beezzer
Earlier in this thread I asked "how" something like this could occur.
I think I found an answer.
In order to enact martial law and have a ruler versus a president WHILE having the populace embrace the idea is this.
Destroy the power grid.
You may be onto something there. And consider this: They could blame the outage on "cyber-terrorism" and take control of the internet at the same time.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Considering how candidates in government receive millions of dollars from donors and how intimately government is tied to economic power it makes me wonder. Almost 1 in 2 congress members are millionaires. In the general population, about 8% are millionaires. Right there is a disparity.
abcnews.go.com...
47% of Congress Members Millionaires — a Status Shared by Only 1% of Americans
By Tom Shine Nov 16, 2011 8:45am
It’s no secret that many members of the U.S. House and Senate are millionaires — 47 percent of them — their salaries paid in part by the American taxpayers.
The Center for Responsive Politics has crunched the numbers and released the results on its Open Secrets blog:
“About 47 percent of Congress, or 249 current members are millionaires. … In 2010, the estimated median net worth of a current U.S. senator stood at an average of $2.56 million,” according to the Center’s research.
“Despite the global economic meltdown in 2008 and the sluggish recovery that followed, that’s up about 7.6 percent from an estimated median net worth of $2.38 million in 2009 … and up 13 percent from a median net worth of $2.27 million in 2008. … Fully 36 Senate Democrats, and 30 Senate Republicans reported an average net worth in excess of $1 million in 2010. The same was true for 110 House Republicans and 73 House Democrats.”
“The vast majority of members of Congress are quite comfortable, financially, while many of their own constituents suffer from economic hardships,” said Sheila Krumholz at the Center For Responsive Politics. “Few Americans enjoy the same financial cushions maintained by most members of Congress — or the same access to market-altering information that could yield personal, financial gains.”
Originally posted by rottensociety
That's not correct at all. Marxism, Bolshevism and Trotskyism were/are the same thing - "International Communism."
Originally posted by rottensociety
Marx had written many flaws into Communism so that it wouldn't work and indeed, it doesn't work.
Originally posted by rottensociety
People cannot all be equal and that's the truth - unless we start cloning humans to all be exactly the same. Just as "Liberty" and "Freedom" are impossible in any working human society with moral responsibilities.
Originally posted by rottensociety
Communism and Socialism absolutely CAN be lumped together because we are not talking about true ideology, but terminology. We are living in a world controlled by the Marxist International and they are using "Communism", "Socialism", "Liberalism", "Social Democracy" and "Anarchism" to get their world revolution. "Socialism" is used because they know people are afraid of the term "Communism" - so they are definitely lumping them together.
Originally posted by rottensociety
Then look what happened!! They took the farm machinery, animals and seeds from the farmers and millions and millions died!
Originally posted by yourmaker
why is a former Cuban military officer allowed to live in the US?
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by headb
Ok, first of all, that is simply impossible. You cannot merge capitalism and communism in a social sense; you are either in principle socialistic, or capitalistic. Of course, China 'mixes' the two, but in it's social sense, China is still predominantly communistic. They utilize capitalism for the sake of competing with the west.
In the anarchist, Marxist and socialist sense, free association (also called free association of producers or, as Marx often called it, community of freely associated individuals) is a kind of relation between individuals where there is no state, social class or authority, in a society that has abolished the private property of means of production. Once private property is abolished, individuals are no longer deprived of access to means of production so they can freely associate themselves (without social constraint) to produce and reproduce their own conditions of existence and fulfill their needs and desires.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by murphy22
There is a price for everything, action and inaction.
Complacency demands the highest toll.
Who's talking about complacency and inaction?
You can keep making this about money if you want, but it's about decency and humanity looking after one another, without regard for "rewards". THAT is Grace, and Love. Read "The Road Less Traveled" by M.Scott Peck.
Wanting what is best, and doing what is best, for another WITHOUT EXPECTING ANYTHING IN RETURN. Just because you can!!
How HARD is that for people to understand?
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
But sitting down in that couch watching football, or whatever other sports or soap opera you are into meanwhile you drink another beer is not going to stop this. You have to protest to the government and demand for the international socialists/communists/fascists in control to be fired from their jobs.
From massive protesting of Americans for the dismantling of the Federal Reserve and getting back to the silver and gold standard, to puting in office people like Ron Paul will be the only things that will save this country from the take over by the international socialist/communist/fascist elites.
edit on 3-8-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: errors.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Originally posted by beezzer
Earlier in this thread I asked "how" something like this could occur.
I think I found an answer.
In order to enact martial law and have a ruler versus a president WHILE having the populace embrace the idea is this.
Destroy the power grid.
You may be onto something there. And consider this: They could blame the outage on "cyber-terrorism" and take control of the internet at the same time.
As conspiracies go, I'd have to put this one in the "plausable" category.
Senate Republicans recently blocked cybersecurity legislation, but the issue might not be dead after all.
The White House hasn't ruled out issuing an executive order to strengthen the nation's defenses against cyber attacks if Congress refuses to act.
“In the wake of Congressional inaction and Republican stall tactics, unfortunately, we will continue to be hamstrung by outdated and inadequate statutory authorities that the legislation would have fixed," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in an emailed response to whether the president is considering a cybersecurity order....
After defeat of Senate cybersecurity bill, Obama weighs executive-order option