It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Except he has used his company to donate to Anti-gay hate groups. Maybe you should read the other threads?
Do you reject parts of Leviticus?
Originally posted by krossfyter
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by humphreysjim
BTW OP, S&F.
If he was going to be consistent, with the word of God, he should have donated to anti-womens rights groups, anti-tattoo groups, anti-wizard groups, anti-asshole children groups, anti- haircut groups, ect, ect.
exactly. why do they like to pick and choose? didnt they do that with slavery and segregation?
Originally posted by butcherguy
True Christians shouldn't have a problem rejecting Leviticus.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
I don't believe in organized religion.
That doesn't change the fact that you're intentionally misrepresenting facts and trying to advance false narratives.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by humphreysjim
Do you reject parts of Leviticus?
Jesus Christ did.
That's what got him into trouble with the head Hebrews in charge.
True Christians shouldn't have a problem rejecting Leviticus.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by PvtHudson
I don't believe in organized religion.
That doesn't change the fact that you're intentionally misrepresenting facts and trying to advance false narratives.
I didn't misrepresent anything. I never said Chick-Fil-A banned anyone. Show me where I did?
Again, I am asking the question whether Chick-Fil-A, who obviously want to take the words of the Bible seriously, should protect their customers from unclean women. If not, why not? It's such a simple question, and it's so obviously the case that they and others are picking and choosing parts of the Bible to suit their own agenda.
That's called a double-standard, I am pointing it out.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
No, it would be a double standard if the store was "protecting its customers" from gay people, which it isn't. You're entire premise is based on lies and red herrings.
No, it would be a double standard if the store was "protecting its customers" from gay people, which it isn't. You're entire premise is based on lies and red herrings.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
I really hope that you are being sarcastic here....
I dunno, ask the Christians displaying the double-standard.
Who are we to pick and choose "God's word"?
Originally posted by PvtHudson
No, it would be a double standard if the store was "protecting its customers" from gay people, which it isn't. You're entire premise is based on lies and red herrings.
Originally posted by krossfyter
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by humphreysjim
Do you reject parts of Leviticus?
Jesus Christ did.
That's what got him into trouble with the head Hebrews in charge.
True Christians shouldn't have a problem rejecting Leviticus.
exactly. so in this sense. dan cathy is not a true christian?
To fill in the blanks here, the early church discussed the topic - "what laws should Christians follow?". The answer to that question was as follows:
1. do not eat food that has been sacrificed to idols
2. do not eat the meat or blood of strangled animals
3. abstain from sexual immorality
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
No, it would be a double standard if the store was "protecting its customers" from gay people, which it isn't. You're entire premise is based on lies and red herrings.
Are they hate groups when the left allies with Islamic organizations that hate gays? Just curious where your double standards are.