posted on Aug, 5 2012 @ 06:06 AM
I can kind of understand the OP's point, it would be like if Usain Bolt's world record was smashed by a caucasian british man, , would it be
politicaly correct to state "Usain Bolt's record smashed by a white english man!" now I know if a statement came out like that then a lot of black
apologists and even black men themselves would probably scream "RACIST!" themselves, and before any of you even try to lump me with the race card, I
will state now for the record that I am actually mixed raced, half asian and half scottish and I have coussins that are half black and half scottish,
so no, I havnt got a racist bone in my body!! color is only skin deep in my book, I have a black friend who's skin looks white on most parts of his
body(well pink, exactly the same skin hue as a white man) due to lack of skin pigment from a bad scolding by hot water when he was younger over most
of his upper body. in his day and age white on black, black on white racism is almost dead, its the apologists and like the OP said, the MSM that
keeps racism an issue, most average joe public's havnt got time or effort or ignorance for racism any more, and heey, if current racial interbreeding
trends carry on, then we will probably all be one color in 200 years time anyway, a super mix of all races, but no particular one race!!
on 5-8-2012 by DARREN1976 because: spelling..