posted on Aug, 3 2012 @ 03:13 PM
Originally posted by cetaphobic
reply to post by votan
Global average sea level rose at an average rate of around 1.7 ± 0.3 mm per year from 1950 to 2009 and at a satellite-measured average rate of about
3.3 ± 0.4 mm per year from 1993 to 2009, an increase on earlier estimates. It is unclear whether the increased rate reflects an increase in the
underlying long-term trend.
That science can be wrong or can be used to push an agenda does not give the government the right to deny any and all scientific findings or
conjecture. Religion IS wrong and IS used to push agendas all day every day, so I sure hope you don't want to see more religion in the government.
You can never know the future 100%, but if we don't act on what could be a huge disaster based on tons of scientific evidence, we're idiots.
Science and religion are both used to push agendas.. Both are also banned or refuted if they do not follow an agenda. Science can also be followed
as a religion as it is infallible to many and many people have blind faith when it comes to science.
Climate science kinda falls into the religion category more than any other as anytime anyone tries to question it as it is supposed to be questioned
from a scientific point of view people are mocked and ridiculed. Just like religious zealots.
If you look on the net you can also find studies that disprove this "science" with other "science". They both can't be right but I thought science
was infallible and we should dictate our life by the way some scientists interpret data and which variables they include or not include. Man it is
sounding familiar to religion to an extent.. hmm interpretation of text.. manipulate it for an agenda.
YOu have to be a little more objective with science and stop taking it as the end all be all and always right.
Now should government had said no? well i am not sure exactly what they said no to. Passing laws is the norm for the USA why are you suprised?? so
what does this law say about the science behind this sea level rising? If the law is to keep us from following science as blindly as religion then i
am all for it.
edit on 3-8-2012 by votan because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-8-2012 by votan because: (no reason