It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by Human_Alien
But it was the things he said that made me wonder about his credentials and I clearly stated as much. You promoted him as meteorologist, is it not reasonable to point out that he isn't? I don't think I attacked him personally at all. Maybe you could point out where I did?
Are only believers allowed to be questioning? You hailed a previous poster for having this outlook.edit on 2-8-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Foundryman
Are we really sure about finding barium in air samples? Is this from a reputable source or one of those things that's been repeated again and again? Only reason I ask is that we do air sampling at my place of work. We have never detected barium in our samples. We have detected aluminum but we use aluminum in our process so that's not surprising.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Human_Alien
Yes lying about your credentials makes you far less credible. Only a complete moron would claim otherwise. Yes if this idiot actually took some courses he would probably change his mind. I dont understand why your defending him.
Human I get that you believe absolutely everything you read with an alternative slant, but perhaps you should sit back and think. You started a thread with a false title, citing a liar and yet you blindly and doggedly defend the guy. Do you just hate being wrong or are you actually this naive? Oh right, motherships and the sun.
He gave his final broadcast on Thursday, September 22, 2005, to work full-time on his unique theories of the source of extreme weather events. He has become one of the largest proponents of a theory that events such as major hurricanes, such as Katrina, are actually being created by Japanese scientists (Yakuza weather engineering) using advanced weather modification technology obtained from the USSR during the Cold War,[1][2] or by American deep black project scientists as countermeasures. On Stevens' website, he cites the research of Tom Bearden, another non-mainstream-science proponent.
The views of Stevens and Bearden are far from the mainstream and have been described as "laughable".[3] The vast majority of meteorologists believe that existing scientific theories explain major weather events adequately.
Originally posted by howmuch4another
reply to post by Domo1
I think if he's indeed a meteorologist (he is not) it makes him even less credible....have you ever known a weatherman to be accurate?....ever?
Originally posted by Foundryman
Are we really sure about finding barium in air samples? Is this from a reputable source or one of those things that's been repeated again and again? Only reason I ask is that we do air sampling at my place of work. We have never detected barium in our samples. We have detected aluminum but we use aluminum in our process so that's not surprising.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Scott Stevens is not a Meteorologist - he is (was!) a weather presenter.
So what? He didn't complete a course. You think that would change what he sees and putting it together with what he knows?
What?.....if he completed his 'course' he'd know something more than he knows now?
Please. Stop discrediting him! He explains what happened. People lie all the time about their credentials. That doesn't make them less creditable.
He is MORE of a meteorologist than the average person walking the streets so a diploma is not needed!
Please. Stop discrediting him! He explains what happened. People lie all the time about their credentials. That doesn't make them less creditable.
Please. Stop discrediting him! He explains what happened. People cheat all the time on their spouses. That doesn't make them less faithful.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
I am pretty sure you already know that this bill never was discussed after committee, and wasn't even written by Kucinich.
He was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty and the Space Preservation Act that was introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich
"Chemtrails: Shielding the Dual Sun Flyby while Depopulating & Brainwashing? (2012-16)"
Futurist Alfred Lambremont Webre will present a compelling working hypothesis: that the Chemtrails program was designed with a primary (secret) intent to provide an atmospheric shield to hide from public view the approach of the celestial body Nibiru, a possible brown dwarf twin star to our Sun now beginning to approach its perihelion or closest distance to our Sun.
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by Uncinus
The chemtrail theory, and its applications, (of which there are patents) had nothing to do with Nibiru, that's just being silly and derisive of something that has been identified as a possible scenario in the case of a global warming. If you believe in global warming/ climate change/ AGW,it doesn't matter, if there are enough believers where it matters something will happen, and probably has experimentally at least. There is no point in scoffing without some shred of something on the table, you need to address that, and actually in a big way.