reply to post by Labrynth2012
@Labrynth2012: Yes, this post is from March of 2012, but time is a just a construct, so..... what's "old" to you will always
be "new" to
someone else. While I am no apologist, you've chosen to pass judgement upon fellow truth-seekers & that just plain smarts to no end for me. Is it
possible for you to disagree respectfully? You are absolutely
entitled to your opinion, but how is it that you come to qualify your
point-of-view by disparaging the character of these individuals? Are you not able to articulate your point of view in a respectful & intellectually
You may not like everything or anything these individuals say or do, but they are at the forefront of truth seeking, plain & simple. To be dismissive
& judgmental towards them is like cutting off your nose to spite your face.... it just doesn't help anyone or anything. Believe it or not, we all
want the same thing...
David Wilcock is responsible for a great deal of my awakening. I have participated in his forums going back to 2004 when it was on Yahoo! Groups. If
anybody has more courage to openly speak their mind without fearing reprisal, I'd like for them to be pointed out. He led me to
L & L Research
& The Law of One
(which, by the way, reads like a PhD Dissertation -
it is the most intellectual & precise of any channeled material out there), which led me to Glenn Pendleton's
Sons of The Law of One
who introduced me to Bashar
who absolutely busted
the flood gates wide open for me. He takes The Law of One & breaks it down to it's core & quintessential tenants. After absorbing his material
heavily in the last few weeks, I find myself becoming distant from David Wilcock's perspectives. For whatever reason, the things he talks about & the
way he talks about them are very, very different compared to even a couple of years ago. But guess what? That's okay, because it's his
& not yours.
If you disagree with him that's great, but can you articulate your thoughts as to why that is in an intelligent &
intellectually honest manner? What exactly is it that he's wrong
about? How much of
"Shift of The Ages
" have you read? Did you get through any of the other two books?
I'd like to see how long it takes you to get through all of that information. When you're done with those, I want to sit down to lunch or Skype with
you & talk about them because those are some intense tomes of pure knowledge, much like The Law of One series.
As I stated, I am finding myself increasingly distant from David Wilcock & definitely gravitating towards Dr. Greer. I just learned that Gordon
Novell passed away & he gave a ringing endorsement to Dr. Greer. I admittedly do not know all that much about his saga, but I'm beginning to
investigate what he has developed over time & am seriously thinking of joining that whole scene... but who knows? The biggest thing I see is that
these people feel very strongly about their beliefs & they are constantly
engaging the public to talk about a subject that is ridiculed &
berated publicly to the point of no one talking about it at all for fear of being shunned & labeled as mentally divergent. I do not know of any other
credentialed person out there who consistently puts himself in the public eye & is not afraid to stand ridiculed amongst the populace. The average
person has a great deal of respect for education, especially in the field of medicine, so why not listen to someone who is intelligent, articulate &
respectful, talk about something that is akin to Bigfoot in their eyes? Steven Greer has the background & demeanor to make something happen in this
field & he has not faltered from his public statements since day one. You ask why & I ask you why not?
As for Dr. Heiser, the guy has a Phd & has taught at a major university for several years, not to mention being a contributing editor to the most
widely used Biblical Text software on the globe! I mean, what more do you want? I do not agree with some of the things he says & writes, but the guy
asks you to be intellectually honest with the material you are reading. Sitchin did absolutely nothing "scholarly" with his translations & they
simply do not
stand up to scholarly review in any way, shape, or form.
Dr. Heiser even takes you on a textual search via screencasts on
YouTube that shows everyone
Sitchin's translations cannot be subsantiated! For the love of God, what more can you possibly
Mike Heiser has no axe to grind with anyone personally, he just wants you to stop parroting what others say & demonstrate that you've
done your homework.