It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sly1one
If he is acting out his loss of memory he is doing so to avoid punishment for something he KNOWS was wrong...If he didn't know it was wrong he would need to try and avoid punishment as he wouldn't be expecting it.
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
Originally posted by Sly1one
If he is acting out his loss of memory he is doing so to avoid punishment for something he KNOWS was wrong...If he didn't know it was wrong he would need to try and avoid punishment as he wouldn't be expecting it.
He is just gaming the system. To imply that he knows it’s wrong, is projecting. He knows that society thinks it’s wrong, and based on that knowledge, he knows how society will react. To him, he knows that society’s moral idea of killing is relative. He no longer has such inhibitions against such anti social stuff. The truth has set him free.
To him, the world is just one big Petri dish and his experiment has became his life..
Unless we gain accsess to his papers writtings ect we dont know what he was into..Just because his course or thesis was such an such .Doesnt mean he was soley studying that subject alone..Recently in the UK we had a serial killer the self profesed Crossbow Canibal Killer whom was doing a doctrate on serial killers at University now wether his intrest inspired his killings or as the OP suggests maybe he also went native ..A kind of Stockholm Syndrome of The Mind?..Great post by the way s an f from me.....I will see if I can find a link to post on the Cross Bow Serial Killer..
Originally posted by squirelnutz
reply to post by Mr Tranny
Interesting theory, but he wasn't studying evil, he was studying perceptions of time
Or your not what you think you are..You are what you think...My Mum...
Originally posted by XxRagingxPandaxX
The mind is everything. What you think you become.
Buddha
As a teenager, Stephen regularly shoplifts. When a supermarket manager tries to stop him, Stephen attacks with a knife. Aged just 17, he’s sentenced to three years’ youth custody. He tells probation officers he fantasises about serial killing.
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
There is no inherent thing in a person that prevents them from carrying out acts of killing, or mass destruction. The thing that restrains a person is their upbringing. The morality and ethics that they are taught when they are growing up.
That fact becomes all the more important when they enter a field of study where they are dealing with the very perception of reality that those morals are based on.
There has been a long standing problem in research. That is the tendency for the researcher to go native. A researcher has to study the interaction from an independent third person perspective. To stay independent, he has to have a solid psychological/moral grounding to prevent his mind from getting caught up in what he is researching.
If he was not taught the importance of maintaining that moral/ethical/psychological grounding by people he trust, and people that educate him, then he can very easily get caught up in his own research.
His parents may be religious, but if he actively rejected their world view and embraced the moral relativism that his mentors, and classmates embraced, then he lost his mental foundation that allowed him to observe his research from a stable view point.
He is the modern equivalent of the researcher that went to the jungle to study head hunters. The one that started socially interacting with his research subjects. The one that started smoking the same mind altering substances as his research subjects. The one that started hunting heads along side his research subjects. The one that helped his research subjects kill the rescue team that was sent in to try to find out what happened to him.
He was studying how people perceive reality. To figure out how people that are classified as “insane” or “evil” think.
The irony is that he succeeded in his research. He figured out how those people view the world. But the problem is he did not have enough of a psychological foundation to prevent that way of viewing the world from taking over how he himself viewed the world. It made more sense than his own world view.
He went native.