It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"I have no desire to do a Mars landing on our own," Bolden said. "The U.S. cannot always be the leader, but we can be the inspirational leader through international cooperation" in space exploration.
I think we should strive to pursue this quest on our own instead of teaming up. Let other countries go to mars or moon on their own. I was puzzled at the statement by Mr Bolden. Why can't we lead now? Is it due to the budget issues or politics in the background that we don't know about? Is NASA lacking the key technical staff?
Originally posted by hp1229
I think we should strive to pursue this quest on our own instead of teaming up. Let other countries go to mars or moon on their own. I was puzzled at the statement by Mr Bolden. Why can't we lead now? Is it due to the budget issues or politics in the background that we don't know about? Is NASA lacking the key technical staff?
"I have no desire to do a Mars landing on our own," Bolden said. "The U.S. cannot always be the leader, but we can be the inspirational leader through international cooperation" in space exploration.
LINK
Your thoughts/comments/opinions/viewpoints please.
Originally posted by MDDoxs
The Majority of NASA missions have been a conglomeration of work done by many different nations. NASA brought in Nazi scientists during Operation Paperclip at its birth...remember?
Canada has contributed much to the development of the shuttle and the international space station.
To say that you want to go it alone is quote a naive statement, no offense.
I would not mind going to mars with a US counterpart.....edit on 2-8-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Well I think it should be privatized heavily. NASA is a Government Agency. Surely there will be heavy mismanagement of funds.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by hp1229
America is broke, and would rather spend $$$ on it's toy soldiers than its rocket ships.
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by MDDoxs
The Majority of NASA missions have been a conglomeration of work done by many different nations. NASA brought in Nazi scientists during Operation Paperclip at its birth...remember?
Canada has contributed much to the development of the shuttle and the international space station.
To say that you want to go it alone is quote a naive statement, no offense.
I would not mind going to mars with a US counterpart.....edit on 2-8-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Well if NASA brings them onboard as a private contractor and a paid consultant, any work that is performed belongs to NASA. Its basically hiring someone to do your work. Pretty simple to me. Likewise the components and major plants are situated world wide for major airplane manufacturers. Yet the final product represents the company and country that undertook its design and development and ofcourse commercializing the product.
NASA's vision: To reach for new heights and reveal the unknown so that what we do and learn will benefit all humankind.
To do that, thousands of people have been working around the world -- and off of it -- for 50 years, trying to answer some basic questions. What's out there in space? How do we get there? What will we find? What can we learn there, or learn just by trying to get there, that will make life better here on Earth?
.
Originally posted by MDDoxs
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by MDDoxs
The Majority of NASA missions have been a conglomeration of work done by many different nations. NASA brought in Nazi scientists during Operation Paperclip at its birth...remember?
Canada has contributed much to the development of the shuttle and the international space station.
To say that you want to go it alone is quote a naive statement, no offense.
I would not mind going to mars with a US counterpart.....edit on 2-8-2012 by MDDoxs because: (no reason given)
Well if NASA brings them onboard as a private contractor and a paid consultant, any work that is performed belongs to NASA. Its basically hiring someone to do your work. Pretty simple to me. Likewise the components and major plants are situated world wide for major airplane manufacturers. Yet the final product represents the company and country that undertook its design and development and ofcourse commercializing the product.
Wow, so in your opinion we are just the mindless labour eh?
Here is a quote from NASA website to perhaps enlighten you a bit
NASA's vision: To reach for new heights and reveal the unknown so that what we do and learn will benefit all humankind.
To do that, thousands of people have been working around the world -- and off of it -- for 50 years, trying to answer some basic questions. What's out there in space? How do we get there? What will we find? What can we learn there, or learn just by trying to get there, that will make life better here on Earth?
.
Source
People are forgetting that Mars does not have a magnetosphere,
Mars has a very weak magnetosphere, so it deflects solar winds poorly.
its atmosphere is about one hundredths of Earth,
Mars has an atmosphere. Although it is very thin (about 0.7% of Earth's atmosphere) it provides some protection from solar and cosmic radiation and has been used successfully for aerobraking of spacecraft.
the temperature never gets above 40 below, the atmosphere is mostly methane and CO2, and someone saw a tree growing?
Mars is much colder than Earth, with a mean surface temperature of −63 °C and a low of −140 °C. The lowest temperature ever recorded on Earth was −89.2 °C, in Antarctica.
There are natural settings on Earth where humans have explored that match some conditions on Mars. The highest altitude reached by a manned balloon ascent, a record set in May 1961, was 34,668 meters (113,740 feet).[4] The pressure at that altitude is about the same as on the surface of Mars.[5] Extreme cold in the Arctic and Antarctic match all but the most extreme temperatures on Mars.
The ultra violet from the sun would fry it!
Mars has no global magnetic field comparable to Earth's geomagnetic field. Combined with a thin atmosphere, this permits a significant amount of ionizing radiation to reach the Martian surface. The Mars Odyssey spacecraft carried an instrument, the Mars Radiation Environment Experiment (MARIE), to measure the dangers to humans. MARIE found that radiation levels in orbit above Mars are 2.5 times higher than at the International Space Station. Average doses were about 22 millirads per day (220 micrograys per day or 0.08 gray per year.)[10] A three-year exposure to such levels would be close to the safety limits currently adopted by NASA. Levels at the Martian surface would be somewhat lower and might vary significantly at different locations depending on altitude and local magnetic fields.
Without a magnetosphere, Mars really is dead, nothing to hold its atmosphere (gravity too weak) nothing to protect it from the Suns nasty rays (ultra violet, infrared, charged particles [really bad stuff], and other assorted stuff the sun likes to throw around) plus plenty of micro meteorites from the asteroid belt hitting Mars.
Early human missionsSee also: Vision for Space Exploration
Early human missions to Mars, such as those being tentatively planned by NASA, FKA and ESA would not be direct precursors to colonization. They are intended solely as exploration missions, as the Apollo missions to the Moon were not planned to be sites of a permanent base.
Colonization requires the establishment of permanent bases that have potential for self-expansion. A famous proposal for building such bases is the Mars Direct plan, advocated by Robert Zubrin.[17] The Mars Society has established the Mars Analogue Research Station Programme at sites Devon Island in Canada and in Utah, United States, to experiment with different plans for human operations on Mars, based on Mars Direct. Modern Martian architecture concepts often include facilities to produce oxygen and propellant on the surface of the planet.
Originally posted by pikestaff
People are forgetting that Mars does not have a magnetosphere, its atmosphere is about one hundredths of Earth,
the temperature never gets above 40 below, the atmosphere is mostly methane and CO2, and someone saw a tree growing? The ultra violet from the sun would fry it!
Without a magnetosphere, Mars really is dead, nothing to hold its atmosphere (gravity too weak) nothing to protect it from the Suns nasty rays (ultra violet, infrared, charged particles [really bad stuff], and other assorted stuff the sun likes to throw around) plus plenty of micro meteorites from the asteroid belt hitting Mars.
I somehow doubt that. I think its mismanagement of funds by the agency.
Originally posted by projectvxn
This has more to do with money than anything else.
The fact is a manned mission to Mars would be incredibly expensive. The only way we're going to be able to do it is to develop technologies in conjunction with other nations.