Oracle of Tibet predicted the India blackout, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 1-8-2012 @ 01:49 PM by NotReallyASecret
The prediction:
www.phayul.com...

The blackout:
en.wikipedia.org...


Now I have to emphasize that these channeled spirits are NOT considered enlightened beings.

They are merely mundane spirits on the level of Yahweh, Allah etc.
edit on 1-8-2012 by NotReallyASecret because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 01:55 PM by Praetorius
reply to post by NotReallyASecret

They are merely mundane spirits on the level of Yahweh, Allah etc.

lol...perhaps I've misunderstood either your post, or something somewhere else in my upbringing!

Before I even try to dig into the prophecy, could you clarify that statement a bit for me? Doesn't really matter a great deal to me what your beliefs on the matter are, I just want to understand what you're saying here, since I've never heard the term mundane applied to either of them...


reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 01:57 PM by NotReallyASecret
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to
post by NotReallyASecret

They are merely mundane spirits on the level of Yahweh, Allah etc.

lol...perhaps I've misunderstood either your post, or something somewhere else in my upbringing!

Before I even try to dig into the prophecy, could you clarify that statement a bit for me? Doesn't really matter a great deal to me what your beliefs on the matter are, I just want to understand what you're saying here, since I've never heard the term mundane applied to either of them...




From the Buddhist point of view Yahweh and Allah would merely be sentient beings because everything is dependently originated/co-arisen.


reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 02:03 PM by Praetorius
reply to post by NotReallyASecret

From the Buddhist point of view Yahweh and Allah would merely be sentient beings because everything is dependently originated/co-arisen.

I see...I think. Do you mean INdependently originated? Apologies in advance, as I've not studied much of any buddhist teaching.

That one just kind of lost me as my only understanding of mundane is "earthly, not spiritual" or commonplace and not really noteworthy, neither of which seemed to fit well.

Learning something new everyday, I suppose. Thanks, friend.


reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 02:05 PM by NotReallyASecret
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to
post by NotReallyASecret

From the Buddhist point of view Yahweh and Allah would merely be sentient beings because everything is dependently originated/co-arisen.

I see...I think. Do you mean INdependently originated? Apologies in advance, as I've not studied much of any buddhist teaching.

That one just kind of lost me as my only understanding of mundane is "earthly, not spiritual" or commonplace and not really noteworthy, neither of which seemed to fit well.

Learning something new everyday, I suppose. Thanks, friend.




I can point to you to the book "Center of the Sunlit Sky" by Karl Brunnholzl.

Probably can be borrowed through interlibrary loan.


reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 02:34 PM by NotReallyASecret
Originally posted by The GUT
Pretty intense stuff. The DL basically states that they take the information with a grain of salt and just use it as a second opinion so to speak.

Dalai Lama Consults Trance Channeled Entities! Rare Video



Yes these spirits are simply mundane spirits (gyalpos). So you wouldn't 100% trust them. They are just another source of information.

Just like western magicians who summon spirits on the magick forums.


reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 06:33 PM by WarminIndy
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to
post by NotReallyASecret

From the Buddhist point of view Yahweh and Allah would merely be sentient beings because everything is dependently originated/co-arisen.

I see...I think. Do you mean INdependently originated? Apologies in advance, as I've not studied much of any buddhist teaching.

That one just kind of lost me as my only understanding of mundane is "earthly, not spiritual" or commonplace and not really noteworthy, neither of which seemed to fit well.

Learning something new everyday, I suppose. Thanks, friend.



Allah didn't exist until Mohammed. The word Allah simply means the god. They have never clearly explained which god that it is. Allah is just a word, nothing more.



reply posted on 1-8-2012 @ 09:03 PM by Praetorius
reply to post by WarminIndy

Allah didn't exist until Mohammed. The word Allah simply means the god. They have never clearly explained which god that it is. Allah is just a word, nothing more.

While it's not really anything I care to debate, this is technically not correct (or complete, as it's actually a contraction).

Allah was pre-islamic and likely the chief/creator deity of pagan arabs. The term is comparable to hebrew El. Generally agreed otherwise, though, I was just speaking as to the common perception/claims.

That makes me wonder, though...was an actual personal name for god never given in Islam?

/quibbling


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 09:18 PM by WarminIndy
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to
post by WarminIndy

Allah didn't exist until Mohammed. The word Allah simply means the god. They have never clearly explained which god that it is. Allah is just a word, nothing more.

While it's not really anything I care to debate, this is technically not correct (or complete, as it's actually a contraction).

Allah was pre-islamic and likely the chief/creator deity of pagan arabs. The term is comparable to hebrew El. Generally agreed otherwise, though, I was just speaking as to the common perception/claims.

That makes me wonder, though...was an actual personal name for god never given in Islam?

/quibbling


Allah was a word that means "the god", the pre-Islamic deity worshiped by the Quraysh was Hu'bal. Mohammed removed the name of Hu'bal but maintained the traditions of worship and encouraged his followers to keep worshiping the same, while never telling them it was the same deity.

No, they do not say a name, they simply say "the god is the name of the god"....that makes no sense because all deities have names, there has never been one ever just called "the god". Even they will tell us that allah simply means "the god". Which one though they are afraid to admit, because they really know it is Hu'bal and the continue the patterns of worship the original worshipers of Hu'bal did. The original worshipers of Hu'bal walked between the Mountains, they circumambulated the Kaaba, and they venerate the black stone, just as the worshipers of Hu'bal did. Mohammed may have smashed the icon, he never removed the same worship.

In fact, the tradition of Ramadan actually began in India with Hinduism. Interesting enough they continue to worship the same way, take the same steps, bow the same bows, pray the same prayers, do all of those things that were reserved for Hu'bal.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Belief in God/Jesus through Personal experiences.
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
What was God doing before "In the beginning"?
  Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Stay Out Of HELL.
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Do Christians really want to Start World War 3?
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
My Hopeful Reintroduction to God
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags