It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You do realize that all it would take is a popular general to declare it, and the debt would simply no longer exist. There is no rule book that says you can't just declare the debt no longer existing; no reason why a dictator cannot tell China to go screw over.
Now within China, oh yes. They would still have to deal with that made up money. They would collapse with us. When you sign a deal like China and America have, you either stand together or fall together. When the US collapses, China has no more money. When China collapses, the US has no more consumer economy. The two shall burn in the same fire.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Kastogere
Don't play semantics. If I wanted a war, I'd send men with guns to kill you and your people until you did what I said. It's as simple as that.
Now you are saying it is an act of aggression. Congratulations on using correct language.
Acts of aggression are not acts of war. In fact, in many cases they are acts to prevent war.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
In today's atmosphere these nations teaming up to shut down the SOH is not that far fetched of a theory.edit on 1-8-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
An embargo is not an act of war.
It is a nonviolent act.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
You don't know the future. For all you know, 5 years from now a national socialist Greece, emerging out of an EU civil war, will be invading and collapsing Russia, and influencing them to help their war against Germany. China desperately tries to protect itself from a vengeful United Korea, as millions of exiled Koreans across Manchuria rise up and declare independence. All the while America is burning in Civil War and Iran is collapsed to invading Turko-Greek Forces united against their common Russian enemy.
You don't know the future.
To assume so great as you, is truly to be a fool of the absolute highest order.
Do not assume the future, least you fall to it.edit on 1-8-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by rock427
Agreeing with Ron Paul on domestic policy does not mean I agree with him on foreign policy.
An Embargo on the US would not be a declaration of war. Considering we did have an embargo placed on us for a prolonged period of time and did not invade those countries, but rather, listened to their requests and opened dialogues to what they wanted, I would consider an Embargo a very powerful tool to be used in preference over war.
The US did not attack OPEC for their embargo. Their Embargo was not viewed as a deceleration of war. We instead talked to them. Furthermore, the OPEC embargo was not a signalling for a desire of war from them against us. In fact, they wielded it instead of war, knowing they could not win favorably in open conflict. In this case, the Embargo was used as a means to avoid war, not a set up for it.
Embargoes are not decelerations of war, but rather an opportunity to make peace through nonviolent aggression.edit on 2-8-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
A little push here and shove there, next thing you know the EU is in civil war, Russia is forced away from China, India and China compete over water, and South America becomes split over which side of the EU to trade with.
An embargo is not an act of war. It is a nonviolent act.
Originally posted by moderateAmerican
Shut it down, who gives a crap. Canada will sell us oil, Mexico will sell us oil, we'll open our own reserves. Then destroy China's deep water rigs off the coast of Florida. It only hurts them. Wake up people if we need to use fossil fuels the US can stand on it's own for 100's of years, for proof check out our own DOE web site. By then we either have alternative energy or there is nothing, in which case the whole world is screwed. China is a third world country trying to be a super power off raping the Earth and man power only. Keep buying your crap made in China, you know the stuff that lasts about 3 months.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by DarknStormy
I think stopping a ship is a little bit different than sending high explosives.
Building a wall is not dropping a bomb. Suffering is not a deceleration of war. Their civilians have all the right to protest their government and change their policies and leaders if they want it to stop.
Originally posted by Tauvington
Are you kidding me? How does this make the U.S. the bad guys? China always sides with whatever side we are against anyways but nobody cares what they think.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Originally posted by Tauvington
Are you kidding me? How does this make the U.S. the bad guys? China always sides with whatever side we are against anyways but nobody cares what they think.
When you threaten to cut off a countries bank from the rest of the world, in this case Chinas, I guess there is no need to worry hey? Why don't we just cut the USA's banks from the world in their support of terrorists in Syria and around the Middle East? Hypocrites and NAZIs is all I see.