Originally posted by Druscilla
Fun stuff, but, likely all of it's Pareidolia
Pareidolia - wiki
Basically; seeing what you want to see.
Originally posted by carlsmith
well i wouldnt know but isnt there a phrase for that `parelia` or something where your eye sees what it wants?
Originally posted by pitchdragon
reply to post by ReAwakened
by the way they should explain me something !!!
i find this picture on HiRISE, very beautiful one, there some awsome pictures
on that one you can even see a dust !!!
A large (approximately 200 meters or 600 feet across) cloud of reddish dust has been kicked up at the base of the scarp. Fine tendrils of bright wisps are visible farther up the cliff face—these may be individual falls of material, before spreading out as the avalanche plummets downward.
So they can have picture of an avalanche in Mars and some very details part of mars and blurry and not detailed picture from the Moon , Nasa has released lately picture of the American flag on the moon ! blurry pixelate one, is it a joke ? i mean now with the satellite imagery we can see someone tanning on his garden !!! i had many answer but, i'm not convinced, i'm not saying they are hiding something, i'm just saying all this sound wired ! and seriously if i can put a city on mars i can also earse it ! should i trust people who can also manipulate picture as they want ? why i will give all my trust to people who can say whatever they want about a subject we cannot verified ? because it's Nasa ? the military Nasa ! no one can really say what is happing behind there wall...
Originally posted by mardukiscoming
Very good thread.Some of those photos were new to me.While I agree that life existing in the past on Mars is just an unproven theory,I can't help but notice in these photos a number of straight lines and 90' angles.These are things which do not happen in nature.
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Guys, here’s some of the better stuff that most of you on ATS may not have seen. Some of them in fact have never been seen before!
All these images have been reproduced from the Mars album of Mikesingh (who was a popular member on ATS once upon a time).
Now there is that theory that Mars probably was inhabited several hundred thousand years ago and the civilization disappeared gradually as most of the water and atmosphere slowly disappeared. If that was the case then these anomalies seen in the images lend credence to this theory as most do seem to have been made by design thousands of years ago.
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Are you sure what NASA is telling us is the truth?
Probably Mars is still wet, and habitable by certain extremophiles?
Whatever happened to that report of immense amounts of methane seen emanating from surface cracks?
Does that mean there's some sort of plant/microbial life under the surface of Mars producing that methane?
Here's what NASA dishes out. Mars looks red, lifeless and foreboding in this NASA image:
Why NASA has to indulge in this is apparently because the red filter on the cameras is supposed to enhance resolution and also reduce the amount of data required to be transmitted back to Earth. At least that's what they say.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Funny how all these pictures dont look as weird if you download them yourself.
Mr singh and his cohorts tend to over process or zoom to much, that area doesn't look strange above.
As for all the Mars face posts, well I remember seeing it on the news when first announced it was taken form a great distance and was low res compared to todays images so it's not what we thought hard cheese