It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Greatest I am
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Greatest I am
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
What if I don't think it's bad to go on a shooting rampage? What if my tribe of cannibals do not think it's bad to murder the missionary and his family so we can have a big barbeque? What about the men who flew planes into the WTC buildings, was that "good" since they thought it was?
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Greatest I am
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
What if I don't think it's bad to go on a shooting rampage? What if my tribe of cannibals do not think it's bad to murder the missionary and his family so we can have a big barbeque? What about the men who flew planes into the WTC buildings, was that "good" since they thought it was?
I looked for this quote that you attribute to me but did not find it.
I want to check the context. Link me up please or tell where it is.
Regards
DL
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Greatest I am
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
What if I don't think it's bad to go on a shooting rampage? What if my tribe of cannibals do not think it's bad to murder the missionary and his family so we can have a big barbeque? What about the men who flew planes into the WTC buildings, was that "good" since they thought it was?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
[
No I was quoting member "itsnowagain" who in that quote was replying to you. If you hit the green link in the post above that I made it should take you directly to the post I quoted.
ETA: okay, that did not work. His post which I quoted appears on the previous page.
edit on 3-8-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by Greatest I am
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
What if I don't think it's bad to go on a shooting rampage? What if my tribe of cannibals do not think it's bad to murder the missionary and his family so we can have a big barbeque? What about the men who flew planes into the WTC buildings, was that "good" since they thought it was?
You assume that mans true nature is evil and that he has to learn to be good.
'Good' is the problem. Everyone wants to be 'good'. They want to look good to others, whether the 'other' is a person, or to look good in the eyes of God. If you are good you will be rewarded, if you are bad you will be punished, isn't that the deal?
But how can you really know what is good or bad? It is just a judgement that you personally make, it divides what is into what it 'should be' (according to my judgement). The 'should' be is a lie. The 'should be' separates you from what is real. This separation is felt as poverty.edit on 3-8-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by NOTurTypical
In reality there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
Then you invent a 'what if' senario. The 'what if?' is 'thinking'.
What is wrong with right now........unless you 'think' about it?
Humans have the words 'good' and 'bad' and lay judgement on all they see and hear. The judgement is what they experience as life. Life is happening as is and humans label it and believe the label they have laid upon it. Humans cannot see or hear, humans judge, criticise and condem.edit on 4-8-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by NOTurTypical
In reality there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
Then you invent a 'what if' senario. The 'what if?' is 'thinking'.
What is wrong with right now........unless you 'think' about it?
Humans have the words 'good' and 'bad' and lay judgement on all they see and hear. The judgement is what they experience as life. Life is happening as is and humans label it and believe the label they have laid upon it. Humans cannot see or hear, humans judge, criticise and condem.edit on 4-8-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
So is it good if I kill you if I think it's not evil?
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You believe you could easily kill me???
Ok - this is your 'belief'.
Belief is 'thinking'.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Itisnowagain
It's not relative to the person. Google "relativist fallacy".
That's my point.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You believe you could easily kill me???
Ok - this is your 'belief'.
Belief is 'thinking'.
Why are you getting bent over a hypothetical illustration? But yes, one bullet to the head by a military trained person would "easily" do the trick.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You believe you could easily kill me???
Ok - this is your 'belief'.
Belief is 'thinking'.
Why are you getting bent over a hypothetical illustration? But yes, one bullet to the head by a military trained person would "easily" do the trick.
You said you can easily kill me. Now you tell me a trained military person would 'easily' do the trick.
Do you really believe 'you' could kill me easily???
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Itisnowagain
It's not relative to the person. Google "relativist fallacy".
That's my point.
Please discuss your point.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Itisnowagain
It's not relative to the person. Google "relativist fallacy".
That's my point.
Please discuss your point.
What is the "relativist fallacy""?
Copy/paste it here.