Mexico Releases Long Awaited Tablets - The Ancient Mayan UFO and Alien Connection?

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by Paradoxone

 

A comic book scene, drawn by a child. It is so obviously fake that it hurts.

You did not answer the question.
To be more precises, what do you think is depicted in that scene, and what is the triangular shape supposed to be or supposed to represent?

reply to post by Paradoxone


I don't really see a triangle. I guess you're talking about the thing that's coming out of the ship and has an alien at the top. I thought the guy said it was a "nice little blow up" of what is inside the ship.

As far as what it depicts, some crappily drawn spaceships doing crap around a circle.

reply to post by Mr Headshot


Uhuh... Serious now, are you trolling?
Here, that's the picture I have been talking about this whole time:




And here's a clearer version:



See? No blow up of anything. It's really not very hard to get, being drawn all crappy and everything.
One circle is the sun, all flashy and spiky with what looks like a solar flare with a spaceship inside it. The other circle is earth, which you can gather from it having an atmospheric layer around it. And look, the sun has a big black smudge on it. That black smudge? Well, it looks pretty triangular to me. How about you?

reply to post by Vitruvian


Yes it is. Or better it was. It's like asking: Where's that bunny cloud you wanted to show me five minutes ago?

Thanks for providing these pictures. The middle one in the top row looks even more like the depiction. Or more like the sun spot on the artifact is a mix of that one and the infamous triangle.

Btw, anyone know what that black spot on the right in third pic top row is?

reply to post by Paradoxone


That is not what's in the video.

This is what I've been talking about:



But that tablet you showed me still looks like it was drawn by the same crappy 7 year old.

Also,

Nassim is insane.

Originally posted by Mr Headshot

But that tablet you showed me still looks like it was drawn by the same crappy 7 year old.

edit on 5-8-2012 by Mr Headshot because: (no reason given)

That is not the point!
You still fail to answer the question I put forth to you. Why? Because you cannot explain why the crappy drawing on an ancient (or in your belief not so ancient) artifact clearly shows something that has been a confirmed phenomenon that only happened a couple of month ago, and even if it's a fake (which I doubt) predates that very event.

reply to post by Paradoxone


It could have been made last week. Nassim isn't exactly credible. In fact, once I realized that this was him, it's indeed laughable that you put so much stock into it.

This doesn't "clearly show" anything at all. There's a circle with a smudge, it could easily be a representation of Kirlian photography and a circular, instead of ovular, finger. Who knows? It's complete bunk, whatever it is.

This isn't the Mexican Government, it's a whack job who wants money from idiots who believe what he says. He's no better than David Wilcock or Richard Hoagland.

This isn't credible in any way, and it has no support from the archaeological or any other scientific community.

I don't have to justify my disbelief, the burden of proof is on you. Saying "THERE'S A BLACK TRIANGLE THING IN THE MIDDLE OF A CIRCLE THING WITH STUFF COMING OUT OF IT AND UFOS ALL OVER IT MUST BE LEGITIMATE!!!!" doesn't prove anything.

You assume too much. You can't assume that a circle in a circle represents a planet with an atmosphere, much less, the Earth. And you can't assume that a circle with squiggly lines around it is the sun.

Your logic is poor, your argument is flawed at best and intentionally lazy and willfully ignorant at worst.



Also, you fail to answer the original question I put forth to you, why is a triangle automatically a stargate?

THE SUN

reply to post by Mr Headshot


Haven't seen a 'kirilian' photo for some time

Originally posted by Paradoxone
reply to post by Vitruvian

 

Yes it is. Or better it was. It's like asking: Where's that bunny cloud you wanted to show me five minutes ago? Thanks for providing these pictures. The middle one in the top row looks even more like the depiction. Or more like the sun spot on the artifact is a mix of that one and the infamous triangle.

Btw, anyone know what that black spot on the right in third pic top row is?

The black dot is VENUS in transit -- PHOTO SOURCE

National Geographic Daily News

The black ball of Venus seems to hover in the sun's atmosphere in a picture of the 2012 transit taken by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory.

reply to post by Vitruvian


Thanks for clearing that up.

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by Paradoxone

 

It could have been made last week.

Except it wasn't, and that's (almost) the whole point. While it would have made my job more difficult to maintain my position, I would still have linked the two images, even if that lecture would have been shown only yesterday. But it wasn't, it predates the March 12/2012 sun spot.

You can't assume that a circle in a circle represents a planet with an atmosphere, much less, the Earth. And you can't assume that a circle with squiggly lines around it is the sun.

Sure I can. It is fairly obvious what the drawing is showing, not even though, but because it is rather crude.

Your logic is poor, your argument is flawed at best and intentionally lazy and willfully ignorant at worst.

You are the one being willfully ignorant. The crudeness of the depiction makes it very easy to understand what is shown. Okay, then don't give me your interpretation of what's shown, fine. At this point it doesn't matter anymore anyway.

Also, you fail to answer the original question I put forth to you, why is a triangle automatically a stargate?

And here comes my poor logic and flawed argument yet again:
Because I have the audacity to synchronistically link the depiction on the artifact and the triangular sun spot from March 12/2012. And since I experience multilayered synchronicities almost on a daily basis, I kind of learned to trust my intuition on things like this.
And just as you don't want to justify your disbelief, I cannot lift your burden of proof for you. That's right, the burden of proof may lie on me, but it is you who is burdened by the need of proof for something that is blatantly obvious for anyone who can connect the dots and sees the bigger picture.

And even though the drawing is crude, the spaceship does look like it's flying out of the triangular sun spot, at least to me. Then I remembered where I saw this sun spot before and linked it to the one from March 12/2012 - hence Star Gate. Plus I remember reading somewhere that suns are used as star gates. Well, the very name Star Gate is a dead give away, if you ask me...

I'm not alone with this interpretation as can be seen from the comparison I posted. I didn't even need to do it myself, as someone had already beaten me to the punch.

reply to post by Paradoxone


Ok, so, if this space ship is flying from the sunspot why wouldn't it just be easy to assume that the sunspot is a city that just popped up, or is invisible most of the time?

It's not obvious at all what it's depicting. The crudeness of the art makes it easy to interpret whatever you want.


Intuition, yes this is totally a synonym for science.

It's not that I don't "want" to justify my disbelief. Saying it that way makes it sound like I'm afraid to try. It's that I have no reason to. I have seen, quite literally, nothing convincing about anything in this thread. The fact that Nassim has his hands in it leads me to put this whole thing to bed, entirely. It's just stupid.

Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by Paradoxone

 

Ok, so, if this space ship is flying from the sunspot why wouldn't it just be easy to assume that the sunspot is a city that just popped up, or is invisible most of the time?
It's not obvious at all what it's depicting. The crudeness of the art makes it easy to interpret whatever you want.

Great Scot! A city on the surface of the sun?
Now that would easily be as remarkable as a stargate
Seriously though, I agree with you on that it could be interpreted differently. If it weren't for the phenomenon from March 12 I would agree with you about the general possibility. Even though it still looks very much like the sun, so I would have interpreted it as the sun anyway.

Intuition, yes this is totally a synonym for science.

Yes, a "science" you lack understanding of ...for now.
That is about to change in a major way though.
For all of us.
Can't wait.

It's not that I don't "want" to justify my disbelief. Saying it that way makes it sound like I'm afraid to try. It's that I have no reason to.

Don't worry, I understood that you just weren't interested in justifying yourself.
However, I never asked you to justify yourself. All I asked was your interpretation, that's all.
...And you finally gave it to me. A city eh? Well, why not. As good as anything, I guess.

reply to post by Paradoxone


When you said "for now..." I said, "oooooh, you're one of those people."

No reason to argue with you, have fun in the consciousness awakening trajectory shift paradigm crossing! Enjoy it.

reply to post by Mr Headshot


That's right, I'm one of "those" people. ^^
What did you expect? I'm seeing stargates on pottery

reply to post by Vitruvian


This video is different from the one i seen earlier this year, but the presentation provided is the same. i am wondering, does any know where the entire video is? I would like to see the full presentation.

Really neat thread. In the video it looks like the advanced lifeforms pushed away a comet or destroyed it to save the earth. I see similar traditions by the people of India where they put a spot on their foreheads and some traditionally trying to elongate their skulls. Some ancient Celtic money also has pictures of flat headed rulers. I can't tell for sure what all these things mean but I like to have an open mind about things. I need to stock up some more coffee if we are going to have Aliens stopping by in the near future.