It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mc_squared
I don't know where you're getting your information from. Most of the evidence shows that CO2 is a very major player in the planet's natural climate past.
Originally posted by deckdel
reply to post by mc_squared
Well, as it happens even leading meteorologists switch sides on this topic, as they re-calibrate their data. Now its global freezing instead:
Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.
Originally posted by winnar
Anyone care to tell me where to upload pictures? Can I even do it yet? I hope so.
Can any of you global warming groupies explain how it warmed and froze for the last 420000 years 4 times (milankovitch cycles) without mans help and where the forcing came from before our industrialization supposedly made it happen? If not your whole argument is up poo's creek without a paddle.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I certainly grasp that insults and repeating the lines and data of others seems to be the basis of discussion here. I don't necessarily come to every debate with my boxes of notebooks for years online in tow. I bring my brain and my ability to reason and think through a problem with logic. I don't look to simply repeat the data of others while offering no reasoning of my own.
In other words, you present your own opinion, with zero evidence to back it up, and when pressed for evidence, you take your ball and go home.
- the not-yet-peer-reviewed paper had spelling errors. (seriously)
Maybe we should see the actual report before assuming a sprll checker wasn't used. Have you never seen incorrect spell checking before?