It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daskakik
The question would then be, why would he have needed to encrypt it if it was not something in complete opposition?
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by daskakik
It would of course also mean, if by lie you mean no Jesus.
I've already described that in painstaking detail.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by daskakik
there's enough of them that if even only a percentage were authentic, well let's just say you've missed his character and charm.
In terms of my analysis and interepretation of The Last Supper I'd say it's pretty good, but to see for yourself you've have to check that thread, open the image at the daVinci imaging site linked and zoom and scroll it yourself. I'm happy with the evaluation I've made, including labelling it a "blasphemous joke", which it is. Ever heard anything like that about daVinci's The Last Supper? Didn't think so.
Instead of attacking everything I put forward with only one agenda and presupposition in mind, either give me at least the benefit of the doubt so to speak, and add something of value, or don't bother posting in my thread, thanks.
They were not written to be taken strictly as literal historical fact, so it's disingenuous to call any variation from actual historical fact, a "lie".
What's with all the hatred I just don't get it, unless it has something to do with the self-labelled word "atheist", which as far as this presentation goes, amounts to nothing more or less than an extreme, contemptuous bias, prior to investigation.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NewAgeMan
I thought the message gave out was intended for everyone? It wasn't meant for only a select few as you imply. Why not spread the word instead of keeping it a big secret hidden behind 15 pages of rhetoric? I personally would love to know what you have figured out. Are you refusing to say it or is it you don't exactly know what you have figured out but somehow have twisted it in your mind to think you have figured it out?
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by daskakik
Then don't be so quick to judge or think of this as some sort of debate you must win, or that to accomplish anything I need to be discredited before the watchful eye of the reader. Thanks.
In the final analysis, a little faith is a good thing. God isn't god-in-a-jar for our inspection, it doesn't and can't work that way, but what he's left us, for those who are open and willing, is more than sufficient, to say the least!
Originally posted by daskakik
In terms of my analysis and interepretation of The Last Supper I'd say it's pretty good, but to see for yourself you've have to check that thread, open the image at the daVinci imaging site linked and zoom and scroll it yourself. I'm happy with the evaluation I've made, including labelling it a "blasphemous joke", which it is. Ever heard anything like that about daVinci's The Last Supper? Didn't think so.
I checked it out when you started it. Again, your evaluation is to your satisfaction but that doesn't make it true.
reply to post by Biliverdin
I disagree. The Gospels indicate that Jesus held John The Baptist in the very highest regard ie: "there are none born of a woman greater than John", the only differentiation here being that Jesus, although of course also born of a woman considered himself re-born from above, not of the flesh, but of the spirit.
Nicodemus and Jesus - Reborn
go to 2:24 in the vid - segment runs to 5:35
Note catefully the subtle nuances (intentionally directed) in this exchange between Jesus and Nicodemus surrounding the issue of rebirth.
What does this represent?
Adoration of the Magi (Magi?)
by Sandro Botticelli, 1475-76
And I'm not referring here to The Medici family and friends, the connoisseurs of Renaissance art at the time.
www.paradoxplace.com...
Who is the bearded man, up top, beneath the ray of light breaking into the scene through the roof?
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
It should also be noted that Botticelli painted the painting with the intention of HIDING it, from anyone's sight, for a long time (on fear of severe persecution by the Church if it was discovered and viewed, and by "severe" persecution, we all know what that means). Why would such a gifted artist risk his very LIFE to paint a painting that no one would be able to SEE, rolled up and placed in hiding, for a period of well over at least 100 years, if I'm not mistaken, before it was discovered, and ah "brought to light". Why?
I think that people like da Vinci and Botticelli knew certain secrets that they wanted to preserve and convey in plain site, yet without getting themselves into too much trouble with the Roman Church, which offer us clues that are relevant to this thread.
Originally posted by troubleshooter in the thread Have you been Punk'd by God the Master conspirator?
God's Conspiracy is to blindside the wise, learned, mighty and noble...
...and most of you have been punk'd.
God first said He would do this through His prophet Isaiah who wrote in the 8th century BC...
"...behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid." Isaiah 29:14
Paul quotes from Isaiah in his first letter to Corinth (one of the undisputed letters of Paul)...
"For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent (learned, intelligent). 20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?" 1 Corinthians 1:19-20
He did it by turning the human notions of wisdom on its head...
"For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:"
1 Corinthians 1:26-28
God designed a way to reveal Himself that would be rejected by the world's best and brightest...
...and it is still blindsiding those who think they are special because of wealth, education or power.
How did God punk most of you?
He revealed Himself as a babe, conceived and born in scandal...
...as a man He healed the sick, sided with the oppressed and raised the dead...
...He opposed the religious and secular elite...
...who executed Him for telling them who He really was...
...but He then turned this corporate murder into a victory over death itself.
Paul said it like this...
"...the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God...the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men."
Your responses will reveal whether you have been punk'd by God or not.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
And in spite of the controversial or scandalous aspect of his physical birth, and that his nature appears to have been not of the flesh but twice-born of the spirit (three times, if you count the resurrection from the tomb), the actual birth of the person, the human being Jesus (God Saves), is well worth celebration as well, so the whole integrity of Christmas is not only maintained but highlighted still further by these discoveries, I hope.
And so on that note, good night, and God bless you all.
may you enjoy this little piece in remembrance and awareness of the one who transcends and yet who also caps the solstice, renewing the world with hope and the possibility of newfound joy and celebration in a shared mutual triumph over everything that would otherwise threaten to rob life of it's most intrinsic value, meaning and good-willed, good-natured, humor, and charm. I love you.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Nicodemus and Jesus - Reborn
go to 2:24 in the vid - segment runs to 5:35
Note catefully the subtle nuances (intentionally directed) in this exchange between Jesus and Nicodemus surrounding the issue of rebirth
P.S. You know, in some strange way, I think we may have arrived at the place where Catholicism and Protestantism meet the truth and the reality in friendship and in one accord. Deny ignorance!
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
The Day of the Cross
www.bethlehemstar.net...
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Sorry but this whole thread is nothing but vague generalizations.
When asked specific questions you come back with more of the same.
In the final analysis, a little faith is a good thing. God isn't god-in-a-jar for our inspection, it doesn't and can't work that way, but what he's left us, for those who are open and willing, is more than sufficient, to say the least!
You being satisfied with the final analysis doesn't make it true. Its like trying to become proficient in a sport by reading about it.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Sorry, but that sounds a little out there. Rewinding and fast forwarding, standing back then forward, something about wedges and yadda yadda. It sounds like you've made a bunch of connections that aren't there and have come to a conclusion that doesn't even exist. I don't mean any disrespect, but I think you are delusional and truly believe you have found some kind of answer when you really haven't. The fact that you either can't explain it or refuse to explain it in simple terms makes me think this. Your extreme wanting of an answer has created a false one for you.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
No, you're right. It would have to include at some point the reader's own genuine humor of perfect understanding by their response to my communication, where the meaning of communication is the response you get. Then and only then, could it be considered true, to the degree that someone else really "groks" it in a heartfelt way or in what Terrance McKenna called felt-presence, or, to be perfectly blunt a "warm fuzzy".