It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Cranial deformation was probably performed to signify group affiliation, or to demonstrate social status.
I do believe in the possibility of a lost or yet discovered part of our past that we have cultural and historical amnesia about for whatever varying reasons.
The oldest gigantic megalith monument builders?
Originally posted by jude11
2 things come to mind:
Would there not be evidence of stretching (elongating) on the skull itself? Since children grow in spurts rather than at a steady rate, it seems to me that there would be 'stretch marks' as many of get on our skin as a result of sudden growth spurts. Stands to reason that there might be some evidence of stretching on the skull itself. Maybe from the growth spurt or whatever was used to bind.
Also, I have always thought of the possibility of neanderthal cro-magnon cross-breeding in our earlier ancestors to bring forth a species that has long died out because of the fear of difference. Perhaps this is an off shoot that either died out because of the offspring not being able to function properly with these skulls or killed off out of fear.
Good read as always Slayer
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Women nowadays in western nations dress trashy because it's en vogue, are we going to go pointing the finger at them and accusing them of being aliens?