reply to post by SLAYER69
I do believe in the possibility of a lost or yet discovered part of our past that we have cultural and historical amnesia about for whatever
The oldest gigantic megalith monument builders?
I agree with ya, Slayer....thanks for the thread, S/F.
Ever since I stumbled across "Ancient Aliens" on History channel, I've been connecting dots, from the Sumerian data to the Revelations of the
to these skulls, and it just makes perfect sense to me. The data, the evidence ON THE GROUND so
overrides the "legends"....
There is no way
that binding a baby's head would make it that big. It looks entirely natural to me. Even the External Image of the lady with
the neck rings... I've seen x-rays (NatGeo, maybe?) about how binding or stretching just reshapes the bones....it doesn't make them BIGGER. Bodies
don't grow extra vertabrae, or extra phalanges, or extra teeth from artificial reshaping.
The pic of the Chinese lady's feet was just sickening.
The pic in the OP indicates a skull every bit as large (even without the cranial lobe cone-head thing) as the adult human holding it.
I've also been thinking about the "Giants" as reported in the OT, and looking into the research into these "giants."
I am more and more inclined to believe we were
hybrids, or "mutts"....
especially curious to me is our head-hair....what other hominid has long, flowing hair on top of their heads, and very little body hair?
THANKS, SLAYER!! YOU (and those like you) are the reason ATS rocks.!!! Will be watching for your thread....
meanwhile, I think I'll invest some time in reading all
of your other well-researched and fascinating finds. FAR more worthwhile than the
forums that just go round and round with un-studied opinions.
P.S. Can you point me to some info re the "Giants"? I have yet to see where they are truly debunked.